Re: [Geotools-devel] [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geotools 2.3.x

2007-01-20 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Sorry for the build failure spam. I am trying to get continuum to report the urls of our server properly. Should be fixed now, spam will stop. Although the the build does seem to be broken. Running org.geotools.coverage.image.ImageWorkerTest Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped

[Geotools-devel] [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geotools 2.3.x

2007-01-20 Thread Continuum
Online report : http://geo.openplans.org:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/256 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:21:59 -0500 Finished at: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:23:06 -0500 Total time

[Geotools-devel] [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geotools 2.3.x

2007-01-20 Thread Continuum
Online report : http://localhost:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/242 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:38:45 -0500 Finished at: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:42:24 -0500 Total time: 3m 38s

[Geotools-devel] [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geotools 2.3.x

2007-01-20 Thread Continuum
Online report : http://localhost:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/241 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:33:57 -0500 Finished at: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:37:36 -0500 Total time: 3m 38s

Re: [Geotools-devel] specifying id for DefaultFeatureCollection

2007-01-20 Thread Jody Garnett
You hack sounds find Justin, just sorry you have to resort to hacks :-) Have fun, Jody > Hi all, > > Writing some user docs for gml I want an example of creating some mock > feature data. To my surprise there is no way to create a > DefaultFeatureCollection and specify an id for it. The only way

[Geotools-devel] [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geotools 2.3.x

2007-01-20 Thread Continuum
http://localhost:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/238 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance

[Geotools-devel] specifying id for DefaultFeatureCollection

2007-01-20 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Writing some user docs for gml I want an example of creating some mock feature data. To my surprise there is no way to create a DefaultFeatureCollection and specify an id for it. The only way is to create an anonymous subclass of it when you construct it. Like: new DefaultFeatureCollec

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1132) Meta buffer computation should take into consideration point symbolizers as well

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Meta buffer computation should take into consideration point symbolizers as well Key: GEOT-1132 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1132 Project: GeoTools

Re: [Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
* [A.D. 20/01/07 17:59], Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote: > Andrea Antonello ha scritto: > >>>In fact I'm just playing around with the geotools libraries 'cause I > >>>found finally time to go throught the news and enhancements all you guys > >>>brought into it. Here I can add that I

Re: [Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Antonello ha scritto: >>> In fact I'm just playing around with the geotools libraries 'cause I >>> found finally time to go throught the news and enhancements all you guys >>> brought into it. Here I can add that I'm amazed, you guys made an >>> incredible work! The coverage is the part that

Re: [Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
> > In fact I'm just playing around with the geotools libraries 'cause I > > found finally time to go throught the news and enhancements all you guys > > brought into it. Here I can add that I'm amazed, you guys made an > > incredible work! The coverage is the part that most interests me, since > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Antonello ha scritto: > Ciao Simone, Andrea, > In fact I'm just playing around with the geotools libraries 'cause I > found finally time to go throught the news and enhancements all you guys > brought into it. Here I can add that I'm amazed, you guys made an > incredible work! The coverage

Re: [Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
Ciao Simone, Andrea, > Ciao Andrea (both actually!!!), > from the information you send us I can spot two problems: > > 1>A tiff file by itself is not enough for working with georeferenced > data unless it is a geotiff, because you have no CRS (for which you > need a prj file) and no georeferenc

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
> >In fact now starts to read it, but not without problem. > >The geotiff in fact has a world file. It should be a "normal" file > >(whatever that could mean). > > > >Jan 20, 2007 12:01:46 PM org.geotools.renderer.lite.StreamingRenderer > >renderRaster > >WARNING: The number of image bands (3) dif

[Geotools-devel] ColorMapped Image and WAS(Re: Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem)

2007-01-20 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Andrea (both actually!!!), from the information you send us I can spot two problems: 1>A tiff file by itself is not enough for working with georeferenced data unless it is a geotiff, because you have no CRS (for which you need a prj file) and no georeferencing (for which you need a wold file

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Antonello ha scritto: > Thanks Andrea, > this is great news! > > In fact now starts to read it, but not without problem. > The geotiff in fact has a world file. It should be a "normal" file > (whatever that could mean). > > Jan 20, 2007 12:01:46 PM org.geotools.renderer.lite.StreamingRende

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
Thanks Andrea, this is great news! In fact now starts to read it, but not without problem. The geotiff in fact has a world file. It should be a "normal" file (whatever that could mean). Jan 20, 2007 12:01:46 PM org.geotools.renderer.lite.StreamingRenderer renderRaster WARNING: The number of imag

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Antonello ha scritto: > Hi, > I've tried the geotiff reader and got the following error: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: GeoKey > directory does not exist > at > org.geotools.gce.geotiff.IIOMetadataAdpaters.GeoTiffIIOMetadataDecoder.(GeoTiffII

[Geotools-devel] Geotiff with no Geokey directory problem

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Antonello
Hi, I've tried the geotiff reader and got the following error: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: GeoKey directory does not exist at org.geotools.gce.geotiff.IIOMetadataAdpaters.GeoTiffIIOMetadataDecoder.(GeoTiffIIOMetadataDecoder.java:114) at or

Re: [Geotools-devel] Letter of support for FGDC Grant.

2007-01-20 Thread James Macgill
rather late I know, but for the record +1 and the project souds cool too. James On 1/19/07, Chris Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We got a majority of the PSC +1ing it, so I passed along to the OSGeo > board, so they could vote on it tomorrow. I will put the finalized > letter in the formal

Re: [Geotools-devel] NIghtly deploy

2007-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I was able to successfully deploy a 2.4 snapshot. Upgrading to the > newest version of the wagon-webdav seemed to help. Not sure if it is a > coincidence or not. > > I have setup the nightly build on geo.openplans.org to do this nightly. Ha, really n