Please upgrade to Maven 2.0.5 - thanks to everyone who helped test the
alternatives today.
News announcement here:
-
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2007/04/24/Upgrade+to+Maven+2.0.5
-
This SF.net email is sponso
2.0.6 fails on me as well. Whereas 2.0.5 worked.
Jesse
On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Ahh, yes I forgot about this. It seems that when a project declares a
>> dependency which has a non-default classifier ( like tests ), the jar
>> collector fails.
My second test is complete - the "mvn -Psite.build site" target also
does not work using maven 2.0.6.
Environment is Java 5, Maven 2.0.6
The error here is expected; it is the same conflict between
geoapi-nogenerics and geometry. The site.build profile has nogenerics
added in as a dependency on
Hi again Landon,
This is how I should of started the conversation: have a look at the
following picture and let me know what you thing ...
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GTSteering+2007+Q1
And if there is a good time to chat with you on #geotools or #osgeo
please let me know.
Jody
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Ahh, yes I forgot about this. It seems that when a project declares a
> dependency which has a non-default classifier ( like tests ), the jar
> collector fails.
>
> So we have two options.
> 1. Stick with maven 2.0.5
Okay that can work.
> 2. Change the jar collector so
Ahh, yes I forgot about this. It seems that when a project declares a
dependency which has a non-default classifier ( like tests ), the jar
collector fails.
So we have two options.
1. Stick with maven 2.0.5
2. Change the jar collector so that it does not execute during the
install phase.
Ques
I am performing the same tests with maven 2.0.6 (same maven version as
Justin has the build box running).
Maven 2.0.6, Java 6, Windows Vista
> [INFO] Building jar:
> C:\java\geotools\trunk\modules\unsupported\postgis-versioned\target\gt2-postgis-versioned-2.4-SNAPS
> HOT-sources.jar
> [INFO] NOT
Andreas changes to the "how to cut a release page" were helpful ...
The second test works: mvn -Psite.build site
Java 5
Maven 2.0.5
Windows XP
You need to increase memory size:
set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512M
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO]
Comments - short this time - inline.
> I must admit I'm a little confused trying to get things sorted out
> between GeoAPI and GeoTools.
Sorry about the confusion; the goal here is to have the GeoTools feature
model cease to exist.
> Let me see if the following sounds like a good course of actio
Jody,
I must admit I'm a little confused trying to get things sorted out between
GeoAPI and GeoTools. Let me see if the following sounds like a good course
of action for my efforts:
[1] Implement my FeatureCache for OpenJUMP utilizing the GeoAPI 2.0 Feature
Model. (The FeatureCache will be desig
I need to get on to my day job here; geotools is costing my sanity.
Before us we have a choice:
a) back out the clover coverage reports (pending any more information
from anyone)
b) back out to Maven 2.0.4
I will let another PMC make that call as I am no longer useful this morning.
Currently mo
So this target failed for me:
It looks like Andrea and Cory both have a license in the required
location(http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/gt/build/maven/build-configs/src/main/resources/gt2/)
andrea do you know anything more about clover - or can I just disable
this report for now?
Jody
Success on Mac OSX maven 2.0.5. Using Java 5.
Jesse
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Darn - my configuration is actually Maven 2.0.5, looks like Justin is
> using Maven 2.0.6 on his build box.
>
> Looking at the pom.xml it looks like "mvn -Psite.build site" will only
> work f
Darn - my configuration is actually Maven 2.0.5, looks like Justin is
using Maven 2.0.6 on his build box.
Looking at the pom.xml it looks like "mvn -Psite.build site" will only
work for Java 1.4 - since that is our release environment we should be okay.
Cheers,
Jody
> 2) mvn -Psite.build site
Configuration:
- Java 5, Windows
There are two things Cory asked us to check:
1) mvn install
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO]
I'm the coupable who introduced Maven 2.0.5 dependency a few days ago, in an
attempt to clean the quite large amount of output during JUnit testing. I didn't
knew that such change would be such an earthquake (I was really thinking that it
would be almost unoticed). I volunter for rolling back the c
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/446
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and t
I brought this up last week and Martin was the only one who responded so
I just went to upgrade to 2.0.6 on the build box. I have been also using
maven 2.0.6 in my local environment without problems. However I have not
tried a release so not sure. But the release never worked for me
straight up
I think that we may be able to go to 2.0.6 but there was a major bug
when it was released (according to cory). And supposedly it is fixed
but cory didn't trust it. Some one is welcome to give it a shot but
it should be tested before made official.
Jesse
On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Andrea
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Andrea and Saul - I understand of where you speak :-)
>>
>> Looking through past email it does appear as if there is a reason to
>> upgrade to maven 2.0.5 (martin had the initial inspiration, when we
>> tried last month it was one of the reasons Co
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea and Saul - I understand of where you speak :-)
>
> Looking through past email it does appear as if there is a reason to
> upgrade to maven 2.0.5 (martin had the initial inspiration, when we
> tried last month it was one of the reasons Cory and I had the build do
Andrea and Saul - I understand of where you speak :-)
Looking through past email it does appear as if there is a reason to
upgrade to maven 2.0.5 (martin had the initial inspiration, when we
tried last month it was one of the reasons Cory and I had the build down
for two days).
Cory had a fata
Thanks for your email; I am CCing the GeoAPI list as a lot of your
questions are actually answered by GeoAPI release and review policy
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> I appreciate the responses provided by Jody and Rob to my earlier post
> about the relationship between GeoTools and GeoAPI. I want t
In addition, why are we talking about 2.0.5? If we're going to upgrade,
shouldn't we upgrade to the LATEST maven? I.e. maven 2.0.6?
--saul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Andrea Aime
Sent: Tue 4/24/2007 11:31 AM
To: Jody Garnett
Cc: geotools-devel
Subjec
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Justin; you are the last guy with a build box right now - I would
> like to know if Maven 2.0.5 is officially a go. I think you will find a
> few other emails on the topic (hi Acuster)
>
> If so I would recommend we make a news announcement (rather then the
>
Hi Justin; you are the last guy with a build box right now - I would
like to know if Maven 2.0.5 is officially a go. I think you will find a
few other emails on the topic (hi Acuster)
If so I would recommend we make a news announcement (rather then the
current email from a week or so ago).
I appreciate the responses provided by Jody and Rob to my earlier post about
the relationship between GeoTools and GeoAPI. I want to respond to some of
their comments in another thread.
Before I do that I'd like to put forth a suggested plan for the GeoTools
Feature Model. I have a personal goal
Support new filter interface in DB2 plug-in
---
Key: GEOT-1251
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1251
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: data db2
Affects Versio
I am furious so I'm not going to say much.
All the builds are broken. I'm stuck just when I need to brain dump so I
can't really go work on something else. uDig needs some brand spanking
new geotools class gt2-hsql...2.4-SNAPSHOT. Geotools no longer tolerates
maven 2.0.4 and the others don't work.
error when counting geometries in shapefile
---
Key: GEOT-1250
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1250
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data shapefile
Affects Versions
30 matches
Mail list logo
