Hi Justin.
Watching the code of the Graph extension we've seen that you basically make
use of three classes to program the Dijkstra shortest path algorithm.
Namely: DijkstraIterator, DijkstraShortestPathFinder, and
BasiGraphTraversal.
The code is very clear and we understand it. The thing is that
The GeoTools 2.4.0 release is available for download:
* http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.4.0
New for GeoTools 2.4:
- significant speedups in shapefile and postgis data rendering
(and to a lesser measure to other vector data sources as well)
- many expressions improvements using
Hi Ben; this is the first I have heard of you on the geotools-devel list
:-) Oh wait I see my email rule moved your introduction email off to my
geoserver folder ...
I see Rob introduced you a while ago; have you managed to read the
developers guid and so forth? It should take a couple of minuet
Rob Atkinson wrote:
> It would be nice if we could migrate current Feature to SimpleFeature,
> but maybe the best alternative is to call the new model something that
> reflects the point - GeneralFeature, FlexibleFeature,
> CompleteFeature, FullFeature, GenericFeature, etc
>
Well in a sense we
Acuster,
don't worry, we are not offended, we are used to take what's good in
each and every email we receive and automatically discards what's not
good, at least accordingly to our standards.
Our intent when asking the permission for this was first of all to
respect geotools procedures and then to
Hi,
the troubles with the javadoc generation (see users mailing list)
were related to a profile we have in the main pom:
java5
1.5
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-javadoc-plugin
Hey Daniele and Simone,
First, I apologize to you if any of my comments have been hurtful to you
in any way. I hope that you will immediately discard any comments from
me that suggest anything personally bad about you or what you are doing.
My words were not meant that way but I have been told tha
Um, following the emails related to the 2.4 release I get the
impression that the release is done, is that correct? I cannot see the
2.4.0 final version of the libraries in
http://maven.geotools.fr/repository/.
Am I too eager, has the repository moved, the jar file naming changed, ...?
Could some
Hey Daniele,
Simone and I ended up continuing our exchange briefly offline.
The gist of my last message to Simone was that your module should make
an extra documentation effort on the required wiki page because you have
such a long dependency chain. This doesn't have to be new text since you
alr
FORCE_AXIS_ORDER_HONORING does not work if longitude first is provided as an
hint instead as a system variable
--
Key: GEOT-1704
URL: http://jira.codehaus.
Hi Adrian,
I'm actually fixing some exceptions management issues on our imageio-ext
project, in compliance with your helpful observations.
Anyway, as suggested by Simone, it would be cool if you send such a type of
suggestions/tips/comments on the ImageIO-ext mailing list. By this way, we
are able
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:07 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks, Adrian.
>
> Do I need both a TOPP agreement for GeoServer and an OSGeo for GeoTools?
Yes.
>
>
> I did not know that svn is a separate account. Should I email
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dotnet, or wait until my paperwork is process
Thanks, Adrian.
Do I need both a TOPP agreement for GeoServer and an OSGeo for GeoTools?
I did not know that svn is a separate account. Should I email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dotnet, or wait until my paperwork is processed?
I will be indeed working closely with Rob A, mainly on getting community
sche
13 matches
Mail list logo
