User Guide must include all licenses used in all modules
Key: GEOT-1896
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1896
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Task
Components: doc, lic
Thanks Rob; I was about to make that point next :-)
As part of transition to acting as a library we should make sure that
organizations that are willing to fix bugs are able to. One of the
difficulties with the current situation is that we have patches waiting
in Jira ; or developers volunteeri
Hopefully I'm not speaking out of school here, but to remind one and all of
the position previously, CSIRO is engaged in a project to bring eResearch
infrastructure to a community of practice, and is funded to support this for
a three year period. We expect to have one or two developers, but at le
I'd agree that we need to find an evolution path. I think there are two
clues in your Use Case scenario:
1) you want to be able to easily get all the data for a particular part of
the world, with minimum effort and maximum understanding
2) when you get there you'll probably have new related data a
Cameron got back to me; he is reviewing our work today and will will try
and have things in order for the incubation committee to look at
tomorrow. It looks like he is sending questions to the geotools admin
list; if you have a moment please lend a hand.
Jody
--
Thanks for writing up your ideas Martin. I will respond a bit more
clearly another day.
My initial thought is "evolution" not "revolution" ... le me explain. It
is nice to clean up modules one by one starting from the bottom of the
stack. That is a good direction; and something I have been work
The remainder of the meeting was interesting; but I am not sure if you
caught it - everyone was exactly right.
From the standpoint of Refractions we often wish GeoTools was more self
sustaining; none of the other open source projects we work with have
such an overhead for us. Now in each case
Andrea Aime wrote:
> so yesterday I was looking into how making validation
> optional into the current feature model.
>
yeah!
> First off, we have this idea that features might be
> allowed to hold invalid attributes, and that we can
> use a isValid() method to check whether they
> are actually
Thanks Martin; sorry to have missed the meeting - I was very asleep. I
will catch up on the logs shortly.
> I also wonder: do we expect all PMC to attend to the meeting most of the
> time? I
> mean "usually", not "every week" of course. If so, should we revisit the PMC
> composition?
>
We ne
Aha!
As I thought, your rant is a mixture of a good vision of the issue, an
interesting intent to improve things, and an unrealistic dream that we
could replace the existing by the improved.
You apparently have encountered the issue of reams of duplicated data
much more deeply than I ever have
I have a plan to put some papers together over the next few months, but in a
nutshell, GIS systems mess things up by attaching identity to geometries
(the surrogates for real world features) then forcing (or not stopping) you
having many copies of these geometries as derived datasets, e.g. to provi
Hello
David Martinez Morata a écrit :
> I'm new in this list and I would like ask for Spanish translation for
> the project. I'm interested in colavorate with the translation.
The state of localization in GeoTools is somewhat partial. A few modules uses
java.util.ResourceBundle for localized mes
Hey Rob,
This sounds like an interesting observation. What do you mean by
"normalized data management"? I would be interested to have a bit more
of your vision to see where it meshes into my (GIS) world view.
--adrian
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 11:53 +1000, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Performance is impor
Reminder IRC time is now 16:30 UTC, which is 18h30 in Paris and Italy, and 9h30
in Vancouver.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=7&day=7&year=2008&hour=16&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
Lately our IRC were begining about 30 minutes
[...]
>> Shapefile doesn't seem to be a feasible choice.
>
> Why not? You control the set of attributes no? So you can add columns with
> the line width, color and whatnot (I guess being a freehand you
> don't have that many options, do you?). Pair it with a properly
> crafted SLD and you're in bus
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Thanks for the help everyone; but I need a little more communication so
> we don't all do the same work. Martin how could I of known that you were
> doing this DirectPosition change?
It was a JIRA task posted a few weeks ago
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEO-135). Th
Hi,
so yesterday I was looking into how making validation
optional into the current feature model.
First off, we have this idea that features might be
allowed to hold invalid attributes, and that we can
use a isValid() method to check whether they
are actually valid or not.
Implementation wise, th
17 matches
Mail list logo
