Re: [Geotools-devel] About the improved labeller

2008-12-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Hi Andrea - > > I am looking forward to this one (and we can make it the default in uDig > trunk so it gets some eyeball time in front of developers - we actually > have a code sprint coming up and are releasing an alpha to generate bugs > reports leading up to it). >

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2230) Move the new GeoServer labeller back to GeoTools

2008-12-23 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Move the new GeoServer labeller back to GeoTools Key: GEOT-2230 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2230 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2.5.2

Re: [Geotools-devel] About the improved labeller

2008-12-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Hi Andrea - > > I am looking forward to this one (and we can make it the default in > uDig trunk so it gets some eyeball time in front of developers - we > actually have a code sprint coming up and are releasing an alpha to > generate bugs reports leading up to it). > I

[Geotools-devel] Some Questions on Setting Up an Unsupported Module

2008-12-23 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
OK Guys. I downloaded the sample unsupported module from the SVN, and I am attempting to modify it so I can get the GPX2 module to be an actual GeoTools module. I started by editing the POM.xml file. Here are a couple of questions I had about editing that file: - What do I use as my ID? - What do

[Geotools-devel] Question about LGPL compatible licenses.

2008-12-23 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Do we have a list of the licenses for Java libraries that are compatible with LGPL/GeoTools? Do we have a list of licenses that are not compatible? I need to each of my dependencies so I can see if I can include them. If they aren't compatible, is it acceptable to have the user download them separ

[Geotools-devel] Including module documentation in the GeoTools User Guide.

2008-12-23 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Is there any type of plan or process to include documentation for an unsupported module in the user guide for GeoTools, or is this only done for supported modules? If I could include my documentation for an unsupported module in the user guide, is there any rules regarding format and style? Thanks

Re: [Geotools-devel] Question about LGPL compatible licenses.

2008-12-23 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey, It would probably be quicker to assemble the list of licenses so we can talk about real instances rather than staying abstract. There are two questions bundled into yours: what are we allowed to link against, and what are we allowed to distribute? The first of these determines what code can

Re: [Geotools-devel] Including module documentation in the GeoTools User Guide.

2008-12-23 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey, You would be welcome to add a section to the user guide on the wiki. For commit rights, look at the home page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/Geotools/Home and for style rules look in the document itself. If it's not there, then try to mirror an existing section. cheers, --adrian On Tue

Re: [Geotools-devel] Some Questions on Setting Up an Unsupported Module

2008-12-23 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey, You are either going to have to answer your own questions by looking at what the other modules have done, or give us more to work with. The ID stucture is generally hierarchical, where the group is the name of the parent block and the specific ID is up to you. Generally, open a bunch of pom.x

Re: [Geotools-devel] Some Questions on Setting Up an Unsupported Module

2008-12-23 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Adrian wrote: "You are either going to have to answer your own questions by looking at what the other modules have done, or give us more to work with." I'll try to send a follow-up e-mail in the next day or two that clarifies the sections of the POM.xml that I'm having some trouble with. Adrian w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Some Questions on Setting Up an Unsupported Module

2008-12-23 Thread Adrian Custer
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:14 -0800, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Adrian wrote: "For the parts of the maven doc, leave as much out as > you can and still > get your module to compile." > > I'm not sure what you mean by "maven doc". Do you mean the site.xml > file which I asked about? No, I was talki

[Geotools-devel] Fwd: Some Questions on Setting Up an Unsupported Module

2008-12-23 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Roger that. Thank you again for the help. I'll revisit the POM.xml file and will hit the Maven website for information on specific elements. SS On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Adrian Custer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:14 -0800, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >> Adrian wrote: "For the parts of

[Geotools-devel] Sample DataAccess for testing

2008-12-23 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody, I have committed the initial implementation of a sample DataAccess to GeoTools trunk. It lives in: modules/unsupported/app-schema/sample-data-access and has artifactId gt-sample-data-access. sample-data-access does not depend on any other app-schema modules, so if you have built th

[Geotools-devel] Preferred way to include optional module in deployment bundle?

2008-12-23 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
What is the preferred way to include an optional/unsupported module in geoserver.war? I have a local modification to web/pom.xml that adds a dependency on gt-app-schema when profile "app-schema" is active. Thus building geoserver/src with mvn -Papp-schema install result in a deployment bundle