Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> There is a real difference (the axis order). The WFS 1.1 DataStore
> should be able to sort things out for you; or if you transform your
> initial ReferenceEnvelope into the CoordinateReferenceSystem provided by
> the WFS it should be able to swap the data value order
Hi,
The contract on FeatureSource is clear for count and bounds. If they
cant be efficiently calculated return -1 or null. But for
FeatureCollection it says to see the Collections.size method which says
nothing about -1 and the getBounds says nothing about null. The
DefaultFeatureCollection ca
Frank Gasdorf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I?m currently using the MemoryFeatureCollection to show in memory features on
> map but I have some problems adding an empty layer to mapContext.
Hi Frank; you are certaintly at the edge of what is expected of
MemoryFeatureCollection and MemoryDataStore (or the d
Hey Andrea;
I am still trying to figure out what your optimization did ...
> Years ago, way before my involvement in GeoServer, I
> introduced a rendering optimization for lines. The
> observation was that if the line width was less than
> 1.5 pixels, setting it to 0 flat would make the rendering
There is a real difference (the axis order). The WFS 1.1 DataStore should be
able to sort things out for you; or if you transform your initial
ReferenceEnvelope into the CoordinateReferenceSystem provided by the WFS it
should be able to swap the data value order around so it all lines up
correctly.
I've setup a default Geoserver install. When I load the states
population layer into uDig using the wfs_1_1_0 datastore I see nothing
until I reproject the uDig map to EPSG:4326.
Geoserver is returning the bounds of the layer as the following (which I
believe is correct):
ReferencedEnvelope[-1
Ciao Simone,
> I am pretty sure other people on the list will provide more info about
> this development if needed. Just so that you know, GeoNetwork is the
> de-facto standard for CSW since it is implemented almost everywhere,
> even, if my memory serves me right, behind the INSPIRE GeoPortal :-)
Hello,
> 1) My target platform is linux ppc or linux/zos, are there any
> depencies to
> x86 hardware (I assume no)
You're right, no dependencies for MDweb2.
> 2) geotools is an import part of the customers GDI infrastructure,
> he wants
> to reuse the skills (of course)
The MDweb2 core is
Ciao Christian,
I have been (and I am) using ejb3 extensively in various projects, I
can tell you that while it is widely used in the JEE financial world
noone, at least that I am aware of, is using it in the geo world.
FYI, GeoNetwork 3.0 which is under development will implement ebRIM
and will h
Adrian, Mathieu thanks for your answers.
After looking at MDweb2, I took a closer look at geonetwork.
Some pending questions
1) My target platform is linux ppc or linux/zos, are there any depencies to
x86 hardware (I assume no)
2) geotools is an import part of the customers GDI infrastructur
Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> I think I am in agreement as well.
>
> Is there a list of Geotools SLD Vendor parameters?
Hum, not a full one. Most of the vendor extensions were
developed by Dave Blasby afaik, and are documented
in the GeoServer wiki here:
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/Labeling
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. What will the option look like
> to the user? Will it be a vendor parameter in an SLD? Or what did you
> have in mind?
No, not in the SLD, as I would have to amend the schema even more.
At the moment we just added three ele
Hi Christian,
Good news, as far as i see, there is no other csw implementation based on
> geotools. MDweb2 is a now a hot candidate.
FYI, GeoNetwork already implement CSW 2.0.2 and we're working on CSW
improvements (Add GetDomain/Transaction/Harvest request, follow INSPIRE
requirements on CSW, .
Hey Christian,
It would be wonderful to work with you---our own projects, MdWeb,
Constellation, and MapFaces, despite being free software, are almost
entirely developed by us alone. We have not yet reached the point of
having a rock solid base which we would want widely used nor the level
where we
Good news, as far as i see, there is no other csw implementation based on
geotools. MDweb2 is a now a hot candidate.
I would like to join your development efforts.
Questions:
1) Which version of geotools do you use. Looking in the war file I see gt
jars with version 2.9. ???
2) I n
I think I am in agreement as well.
Is there a list of Geotools SLD Vendor parameters?
Jesse
On 22-Jan-09, at 4:09 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. What will the option look
> like
> to the user? Will it be a vendor parameter in an SLD? Or what did you
>
Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. What will the option look like
to the user? Will it be a vendor parameter in an SLD? Or what did you
have in mind?
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm writing to build some consensus on how to handle a
> compatibility breaking change.
>
> Years ago, way b
missing IsDefault tag in serialized SLD
---
Key: GEOT-2297
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2297
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core styling
Affects Versions: 2.5.2
Allow primary key columns to be part of the feature type
Key: GEOT-2296
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2296
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: d
Hi all,
I'm writing to build some consensus on how to handle a
compatibility breaking change.
Years ago, way before my involvement in GeoServer, I
introduced a rendering optimization for lines. The
observation was that if the line width was less than
1.5 pixels, setting it to 0 flat would make the
Salut Christian,
We've the same concern and are involved in several project that needs
INSPIRE conformance. MDweb2 is one of those (a metadata catalog
application) and it's using extensively GT on it's backend.
We're curently working on the metadata library to give it a full
INSPIRE conforma
Hello,
Im currently using the MemoryFeatureCollection to show in memory features on
map but I have some problems adding an empty layer to mapContext. I don't know
whether it should be a feature or if it is a bug. I created a FeatureType and
then a MemoryFeatureCollection for that. Im using Ge
22 matches
Mail list logo
