Re: [Geotools-devel] Broken GML3OutputFormat feature type name assumption

2009-03-11 Thread Jody Garnett
Good afternoon Simon: Thanks for supporting Ben, I think he managed to make his point already. To review a few notes from earlier discussion on FeatureCollection As I understand it these discussions stalled due to noticing two things: - FeatureCollection was not defined in the ISO specificat

Re: [Geotools-devel] Broken GML3OutputFormat feature type name assumption

2009-03-11 Thread Jody Garnett
Ack that is a lot of people CCed on this message - is the geotools-developer list a sufficient venue for this discussion? On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody, > > I have run into a problem at the last step of getting GeoServer to encode a > complex feature WFS respon

[Geotools-devel] Broken GML3OutputFormat feature type name assumption

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody, I have run into a problem at the last step of getting GeoServer to encode a complex feature WFS response. I hope you can help by suggesting a way forward. GeoServer GML3OutputFormat uses org.geotools.feature.FeatureCollection.getSchema() to get the FeatureType that is to be returned (th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit rights

2009-03-11 Thread Simone Giannecchini
As far As I know, one could buy a google server and replicate the google infrastructure in its enterprise, at that point he might be wanting to use this plugin to access its own data. Anyway, this code to be donated should be more a demo code than an unsupported module. As far as I know the idea i

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit rights

2009-03-11 Thread Jody Garnett
Good morning: We are not really using spike anymore prefering to ask people to work in the unsupported directory. GoogleMaps can be a touchy subject since they tend to only like javascript programmers access that data in a browser. You are aware of this issue I presume? If you recast your service

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: ComplexTypeImpl

2009-03-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Ben, The patch looks good to me. -Justin Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> I have a patch almost ready, >> and will attach it to this issue: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2378 > > Justin and Jody, please review the patch attached to this Jira issue: > http:/

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2382) User Defined Projection

2009-03-11 Thread Romeo Ahohe (JIRA)
User Defined Projection --- Key: GEOT-2382 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2382 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Test Components: gc geotiff Affects Versions: 2.5.1 Reporter: Romeo Ahohe

Re: [Geotools-devel] User-defined Projection

2009-03-11 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Romeo, I might have misunderstood your writing, but I think you are mixing concepts here. The geotiff reader is able to create a geotiff by using the ModelTransformationTag or by using ModelPixelScale +ModelTiePoint. The problem here seems that you have geotiff with a CRS that is not supported

[Geotools-devel] User-defined Projection

2009-03-11 Thread Romeo Ahohe
Hi, I was using GeoTiffReader from GT2 to parse a GeoTiff file when I came accross the exception at the end of this message. Now, according to section 2.6.1 of the GeoTiff specification (http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/spec/geotiff2.6.html#2.6 ), when the ModelTransformationTag is not

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit rights

2009-03-11 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 this could be a nice example for new developers an moreover we could adapt it to other uses. Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027

[Geotools-devel] Commit rights

2009-03-11 Thread Blaz
Hello! I'm Blaz Repnik and i would like to get commit rights (if it is possible) to work under gt spike. There i'd like to upload my GoogleMaps geotools plugin. Here is the short story and description: I've been trying to add google maps as a geoserver datasource. My idea was to develop a wms

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE 9.3 testing

2009-03-11 Thread Jody Garnett
With a few modifications to the pom.xml everything is testing fine. The only failures I had were: ARCSDEGridCoverage2DReaderJAIOnlineTest - I assume this is still under development? LargePolygonPerfTest - this appears to just be added to the arcsde module for the fun of it :-) Depends on environm