On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Yes you are :-) Now if we can back in onto the nice clear stylefactory
> interface we have going it should be a clear split :-)
sounds good to me, will this allow use to build in sld 1.3 support aswell?
I'm +1 either way.
Ian
--
> The solution suggested in the thread was to make a factory
> that can bear multiple algorithms. I see two paths ahead:
> - change the whole ProcessFactory definition so that
> it returns a list of process names, and takes a name
> parameter in each call (api break)
This is fine; the api is n
Yes you are :-) Now if we can back in onto the nice clear stylefactory
interface we have going it should be a clear split :-)
I especially like the support for "chaining" methods together.
In addition to the existing StyleBuilder it would be good if the
current SLD support class can be merged int
Hi all,
many years ago pissed off by how hard it was to build
styles with code I created the StyleBuilder we have today...
shame on me :)
Now, I would like to propose a new style builder to replace
that old clunky one. I would like it to be very compact,
chock full of default behavior, and fluent.
