Re: [Geotools-devel] Resurrecting the OGR datastore

2009-07-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Hi all, > I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from > its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu. > > The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against > some of the stores we're abandoning (among others). > > One thing that needs discuss

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resurrecting the OGR datastore

2009-07-04 Thread andrea antonello
Ups, found it http://geotools.codehaus.org/OGR+Data+Store sorry for breaking the thread. Cheers Andrea On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:39 PM, andrea antonello wrote: > Hi Andrea, > what is the exact purpose of the ogr datastore? Reading ogr supported > data into featurecollections? > > Thanks, > Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] Resurrecting the OGR datastore

2009-07-04 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Andrea, what is the exact purpose of the ogr datastore? Reading ogr supported data into featurecollections? Thanks, Andrea On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from > its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu. > >

[Geotools-devel] Resurrecting the OGR datastore

2009-07-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, I'm starting to look into resurrecting the OGR datastore from its limbo now that I'm based on Ubuntu. The plan is to make it compile and build again and test it against some of the stores we're abandoning (among others). One thing that needs discussing is which version of OGR to use. I th

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal to move jdbc-ng to supported

2009-07-04 Thread Jody Garnett
> Good point. What do you think about the following: > > * We add a dynamic check for the old datastores in the classpath. When > they are present postgis only matches "postgisng" (or "postgis2"), and > same for oracle. When they are not present however, the datastore will > match just "postgis", a

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal to move jdbc-ng to supported

2009-07-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> I'm +1, but there are a few little things that are not fully ok and >> that I hope we can sort out quickly: >> * dbtype: postgisng and oracleng. What should we do about those? >> The names were set so that we can have old and new postgis in the >> same container

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2598) Have ng datastores recognize the dbtype of their older versions

2009-07-04 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Have ng datastores recognize the dbtype of their older versions --- Key: GEOT-2598 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2598 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Affec

Re: [Geotools-devel] moving jdbc-ng modules

2009-07-04 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > Hi, I have only some hours left before starting into holidays. (For 2 > weeks). You can move, but I cannot try next 2 weeks. Anyway +1 > Works for me as well Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers.

Re: [Geotools-devel] moving jdbc-ng modules

2009-07-04 Thread Christian Müller
Hi, I have only some hours left before starting into holidays. (For 2 weeks). You can move, but I cannot try next 2 weeks. Anyway +1 Justin Deoliveira writes: > Hi all, > > I would like to do the move of the jdbc-ng modules supported this > weekend at some time. I wanted to send this ema