2009/9/13 Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> Nice. A clear cut vision of what this thing should be.
> Keep it that way! (small, focused)
>
Absolutely.
SPSP certainly looks like it could fill an important niche. I have a
project that requires a more-than-basic GUI but is well below RCP
level.
What's the best
Sunburned Surveyor ha scritto:
> There are a couple of things I wanted to quickly add.
>
> - I made a great effort to keep the GUI and non-gui parts of SPSP
> separate. There is no reason why you couldn't easily tweak the code
> for a non-graphical program. This would probably take about 30
> minu
Sunburned Surveyor ha scritto:
> Contributions and suggestions are welcome. I'd really love to see
> other people able to use the code. My main goal is simplicity,
> followed by robustness. I'm not trying to duplicate everything that
> has been done with Netbeans RCP or Eclipse RCP. I don't want to
There are a couple of things I wanted to quickly add.
- I made a great effort to keep the GUI and non-gui parts of SPSP
separate. There is no reason why you couldn't easily tweak the code
for a non-graphical program. This would probably take about 30
minutes.
- The docking windows framework I used
It is good to see that there is some interest in this work.
FYI: The plug-in system in SPSP is done. It is the main thing that I
canabalized from OpenJUMP/JUMP. At this point SPSP is basically a
shell that loads any plug-ins and builds a bare bones GUI that
plug-ins can add "tabbed views" to. You
