Let me check.
My bad; I replied to a discussion about blog posts and managed to send
something only to Simone (sigh).
Jody
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> On 02/03/10 09:33, Michael Bedward wrote:
>>
>> On 1 March 2010 07:29, Jody Garnett wrote:
Oh? I did n
Ah... I see. Thanks Jody.
On 2 March 2010 18:14, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I think the difference is for "data formats" such as CAD or KML where the
> presentation information is baked into the format.
>
> I once had a talk with James about this; and he wanted us to make an amazing
> SLD file that
I think the difference is for "data formats" such as CAD or KML where the
presentation information is baked into the format.
I once had a talk with James about this; and he wanted us to make an amazing
SLD file that would reference each attribute in a CAD dataset and pull it out
into SLD terms.
On 02/03/10 09:33, Michael Bedward wrote:
> On 1 March 2010 07:29, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> Oh? I did not know a release was planned at all.
>>
>> I mentioned on the administration list last week; and only just giving a
>> general heads up now.
>
> The geotools admin list ? I didn't see that one.
Question from the back row...
How does this differ to using filters to set style attributes based on
feature data ? Or is it another, perhaps easier, way of skinning the
same cat ?
Michael
--
Download Intel® Parallel St
On 1 March 2010 07:29, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Oh? I did not know a release was planned at all.
>
> I mentioned on the administration list last week; and only just giving a
> general heads up now.
The geotools admin list ? I didn't see that one. I just want to
check that I'm not missing posts.
I plan to tag by the end of the week. If that suites you ... udig is going
through its release checklist.
Jody
On 02/03/2010, at 12:11 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 28/02/10 08:08, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> I am expecting to go through the 2.6.2 release process this week.
>> Any changes I sho
On 28/02/10 08:08, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I am expecting to go through the 2.6.2 release process this week.
> Any changes I should be aware of? Looks like Andrea/Simone have there
> performance patch in; Justin mentioned SQLLite with respect to blog posts.
> Does anyone have work in progress they w
You may want to handle by passing control over to a custom "renderer"
as is done with RasterRenderer/ShapefileRenderer? Recognize the
featuretype and engage something specific?
Your idea of a NativeSymbolizer is not bad - we did "open" the
Symbolizer data structure - so you can have a vendor speci
Hi,
during the last days random questions on supporting DXF via OGR, or
support KML as a source for data layers made me think about
how to support in the renderer a concept of style/symbolizer
associated with the feature as opposed of being declared in the SLD.
I guess the list of symbolizers to b
10 matches
Mail list logo
