[Geotools-devel] Documentation: xmlcodegen typeBindings, JET setup, and generateSchema example

2010-03-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin, I have documented the xmlcodegen typeBindings, JET setup, and generateSchema workflow I used when modifying gt-xsd-gml3. Hopefully these will be of assistance to anyone else working on gt-xsd-gml3 or xmlcodegen. xmlcodegen typeBindings documented here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/

Re: [Geotools-devel] I can't edit any geotools wiki pages

2010-03-25 Thread Jody Garnett
>> I see two anonymous users asking for developer status there, >> and I don't know either: kniffode and nexus > > The first is my account. Changed from anonymous to Frank Gasdorf. > Thanks; added you in xircles (and thanks for your contributions!). We still have a WMS patch to discuss and/or apply

Re: [Geotools-devel] I can't edit any geotools wiki pages

2010-03-25 Thread Frank Gasdorf
2010/3/25 Andrea Aime > Frank Gasdorf ha scritto: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to update wms wiki page WMS 1.3.0 < >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/WMS+1.3.0> (especially the >> changes from 1.1.1 to 1.3.0). I was not able to do this because my >> xircles.confluence membership is sti

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Data is a hodge-podge of things to help people implement and work > with DataStore/FeatureSource/FeatureStore; most of that is for > implementors but not all of it. What related stuff from main still > needs to be moved? (We moved a lot of it when we broke out data from >

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Jody Garnett
Data is a hodge-podge of things to help people implement and work with DataStore/FeatureSource/FeatureStore; most of that is for implementors but not all of it. What related stuff from main still needs to be moved? (We moved a lot of it when we broke out data from main a couple years back). Jod

Re: [Geotools-devel] I can't edit any geotools wiki pages

2010-03-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Frank Gasdorf ha scritto: > Hello, > > I would like to update wms wiki page WMS 1.3.0 > (especially the > changes from 1.1.1 to 1.3.0). I was not able to do this because my > xircles.confluence membership is still pending > (http://xircles.c

[Geotools-devel] I can't edit any geotools wiki pages

2010-03-25 Thread Frank Gasdorf
Hello, I would like to update wms wiki page WMS 1.3.0(especially the changes from 1.1.1 to 1.3.0). I was not able to do this because my xircles.confluence membership is still pending ( http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/geotools). I followed th

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On 3/25/10 3:08 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). >> >> @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT >> without having an af

Re: [Geotools-devel] Gml2Shp

2010-03-25 Thread fgdrf
try http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/gml/producer/FeatureTransformer.java org.geotools.gml.producer.FeatureTransformer there you can find a function transform to create a xml file. Maybe it helps ... Frank -- View this message in context: ht

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > So should I wait for this one? If it is only next week I don't mind > waiting ... Don't wait, go ahead. > I have also had an idea for "partitioning" a table based on a unique > attribute (the case where a table has a "subtype" attribute ... i > would like to offer a Fea

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Jody Garnett
That would be fine Andrea; I am only testing PostGIS right now due to limited testing facilities. Jody On 25/03/2010, at 6:08 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possible. (this is not a MUST, it is

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Jody Garnett
So should I wait for this one? If it is only next week I don't mind waiting ... I have also had an idea for "partitioning" a table based on a unique attribute (the case where a table has a "subtype" attribute ... i would like to offer a FeatureStore wrapper rather then just the FeatureSource wra

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3010) PartitionFeatureStore

2010-03-25 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
PartitionFeatureStore - Key: GEOT-3010 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3010 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: New Feature Components: data Affects Versions: 2.6.3 Reporter: Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMS 1.3.0 getMap request with SRS instead of CRS Parameter

2010-03-25 Thread Frank Gasdorf
2010/3/22 Andrea Aime > Frank Gasdorf ha scritto: > >> Hello, >> >> I tested a little bit with a WMS 1.3.0 server and had problems with GetMap >> requests. The server has thrown an error that parameter CRS is missing. I >> analyzed the request url and was wondering that SRS is set instead of CRS.

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Christian Müller
Works for me, I will play the "early adopter". Again, I want to state that this is a significant enhancement, avoiding creation of tons of SQL views :-) Andrea Aime writes: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possibl

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is > possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). > > @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT > without having an affect to the GeoServer GUI. The programmati

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

2010-03-25 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is > possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). > > @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT > without having an affect to the GeoServer GUI. The programmati