Re: [Geotools-devel] Encoding GML and Xlink

2010-04-21 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > Andrea, > > is XSIdRegistry turned off for simple features, for performance and > memory reasons? I recall a discussion ... Not sure. I remember at one point something that kept in memory every id of every feature encoded was added that increased dramatically bot

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3048) SLD isDefault is treated as a boolean, but the spec says 0 or 1 instead

2010-04-21 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
SLD isDefault is treated as a boolean, but the spec says 0 or 1 instead --- Key: GEOT-3048 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3048 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3049) SLD transformer does not handle a PointPlacement with no AnchorPoint

2010-04-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira (JIRA)
SLD transformer does not handle a PointPlacement with no AnchorPoint Key: GEOT-3049 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3049 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Aff

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureCollection should be encoded with multiple featureMember elements not one featureMembers element, to support xlink:href

2010-04-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Ben, I have ran up against this before as well, and indeed lots of things will break with this change. I tried it out when doing experiments on a faster encoder and multiple featureMemeber elements led to lots of trouble. However that said I think it would be a good idea to add a configurati

Re: [Geotools-devel] Encoding GML and Xlink

2010-04-21 Thread Rob van Swol
Hi, Perhaps I have not found the complete solution yet, because I just noticed that a href attribute is used where I would expect a xlink:href attribute. Also the xlink namespace definition is missing. Am I still doing something wrong? Thanks for your reaction. Regards, Rob van Swol On 21-4-2

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3050) Factory Param Utility Class

2010-04-21 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
Factory Param Utility Class --- Key: GEOT-3050 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3050 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: data Affects Versions: 2.6.3 Reporter: Jody

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3051) SimpleFeatureCollection to remove generics from example code

2010-04-21 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
SimpleFeatureCollection to remove generics from example code Key: GEOT-3051 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3051 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Compo

[Geotools-devel] short term planning

2010-04-21 Thread Jody Garnett
I had a pleasant IRC chat going over some short term planning items: - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3050 Factory Param Utility Class - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3051 SimpleFeatureCollection to remove generics from example code - replacing default feature collection with somethin

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Reopened: (GEOT-3045) GeneralEnvelope constructed as isNull

2010-04-21 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jody Garnett reopened GEOT-3045: Test case supplied so I can now reproduce the problem as reported. > GeneralEnvelope constructed as isNull >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Encoding GML and Xlink

2010-04-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 21/04/10 15:53, Andrea Aime wrote: > Serving complex features is a performance nightmare, it's well known, > whatever you do please try not to affect the simple case. I think Rini made sure that we did not ... and this may be a case where simple features are broken by *not* doing things the fu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Encoding GML and Xlink

2010-04-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 21/04/10 14:58, Rob van Swol wrote: > 1) changing SurfacePropertyType into GeometryPropertyType in the schema and > creating an empty Geometry does the trick! Well done, Rob, that is an excellent result! -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resourc

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureCollection should be encoded with multiple featureMember elements not one featureMembers element, to support xlink:href

2010-04-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin, I agree. A configurable option would allow deployers to choose the behaviour they want. Kind regards, Ben. On 21/04/10 22:39, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I have ran up against this before as well, and indeed lots of things > will break with this change. I tried it out when d