[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-2.6.x #318

See Changes: [mcr] Backport from Oracle Georaster to 2.6.x -- [...truncated 5303 lines...] May 5, 2010 2:14:30 AM org.geotools.gce.imagemosaic.IndexBuilder fireEvent INFO: Now indexing file

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

Hi Jody and all, Looking again at the javadocs for DataStore after yesterdays discussion about feature names vs feature type names... For a method like: SimpleFeatureSource DataStore.featureSource(String typeName) I guess consistency dictates that the parameter should be called "name" or "featur

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Remove datastore view proposal

Thanks Ben, I'll add that in to the patch. Michael On 5 May 2010 12:58, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Thanks Andrea. > > Michael, +1 from me. > > The only implementation in the app-schema suite is in get-webservice > WS_DataStore, which throws UnsupportedOperationException for getView, which > is a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotool query - Differences in SimpleFeaturePropertyAccessor and FeaturePropertyAccessorFactory

Hi Jody, Thanks for your reply. I had a further look into some other classes, and spotted a similar trend (e.g. org.geotools.filter.expression.FeaturePropertyAccessorFactory). Comparing them with similar classes written for Simple Features, I have made a few changes and, the axis ordering of

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Remove datastore view proposal

Thanks Andrea. Michael, +1 from me. The only implementation in the app-schema suite is in get-webservice WS_DataStore, which throws UnsupportedOperationException for getView, which is a vote to remove getView. :-) On 03/05/10 23:01, Andrea Aime wrote: > This is actually from Michael, I just m

Re: [Geotools-devel] Nominate Florence Tan for GeoTools commit access

On 03/05/10 17:36, Andrea Aime wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> I nominate my fellow app-schema developer Florence Tan for GeoTools >> commit access. > > +1, with the usual limitations Thanks Andrea. And for the benefit of the list I'll include my usual response, that these limitations

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMC: Remove datastore view proposal

On 5/4/10 12:10 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Justin, > >> In ContentDataStore I attempted to implement it by having >> ContentFeatureSource be able to "join itself" to another query / view. >> But again never tested it. > > The patch doesn't include ContentDataStore currently, but would you be >

[Geotools-devel] Oracle GeoRaster Module Documentation

Please take a look at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/Oracle+GeoRaster+Plugin Comments/corrections are welcome. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

On 04/05/2010, at 9:38 PM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Thanks Jody. Can I try you with another one ? The getInfo method docs > include this... > > * Please note that for FeatureContent: > * > * name - unique with in the context of a Service > * schema - used to identify the type of

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

Thanks Jody. Can I try you with another one ? The getInfo method docs include this... * Please note that for FeatureContent: * * name - unique with in the context of a Service * schema - used to identify the type of resource; usually gml schema; although it may be more specifi

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

My words come back to haunt me. Here is the deal - featureSource.getName() is only used to retrieve the featureSource from the dataStore. It is *not* the same as: - featureSource.getSchema().getName() - which exists and refers to the FeatureType used by the contents of the feature source - feat

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

Hi Jody and all, Working on FeatureSource javadocs. Can anyone put the following into simple words for me... * Though it's a common practice when dealing with {...@link SimpleFeatureType} * and {...@link SimpleFeature} to assume they're equal. There's no conflict * (as per the dyn

Re: [Geotools-devel] javadoc updates

Another follow up item to the recent work: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Upgrade+to+2.7 Updated to covered recent changes; see anything wrong edit the page :-) Jody On 03/05/2010, at 4:31 PM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Jody and all, > > I'm slowly going over the javadocs for the