Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC on Xlink-Geometry patch

Works for me. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Niels wrote: > What about this: > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2010&month=11&day=4&hour=1&min=0&sec=0&p1=240&p2=196&p3=55 > > Or is 12.00 bad time for Jody? Problem is that earlier gets difficult for > me and l

Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC on Xlink-Geometry patch

What about this: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2010&month=11&day=4&hour=1&min=0&sec=0&p1=240&p2=196&p3=55 Or is 12.00 bad time for Jody? Problem is that earlier gets difficult for me and later might get difficult for Justin :S Niels On 03/11/10 12:01, Justin

Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC on Xlink-Geometry patch

Hi Niels, Good idea, the last IRC breakout we had was very productive. Tomorrow morning (evening for me) will work. Just let me know what time works for y'all down under and i'll be there. -Justin On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Niels wrote: > Particularly @Justin and @Jody: > > Could we have

[Geotools-devel] IRC on Xlink-Geometry patch

Particularly @Justin and @Jody: Could we have an IRC discussion on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3219 until we finally clear things out? (One comment per day on Jira might take us a long time still). We are discussing changes in the main package and if/how they could be avoided. Perh

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

Hi Frank The current module contains two implementations of DataStore (one for WFS 1.0 and another for WFS 1.1). The datastore factory handles the version negotiation and will create the correct instance for the server you are contacting. So I would highly recommend starting a new datastore fro

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

Gabriel, thanks for this! Now I understand the structure within the module much better! I can understand to create a new unsupported module is much easier that to refactor an existing one. But from my point of view because of history and module structure, I would prefer the later. I'd like to have

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

Glad you want to help Roy, I can provide you some of the guidance you need to get started. First a clarification: The wfs module is divided in classes that support wfs 1.0 and 1.1. The 1.0 code path is the one that's unsupported, because no one that I know is able to really maintain it, nor de old

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

Hi Justin, I already committed some patches to the WFS module, so step 1 is taken :). I 'll have a look at the link you provided me. Still some questions open, but i hope Gabriel can answer those. Roy _ From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeol...@opengeo.org] To: Roy Braam [mailto:roybr.

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to modify source code to offset maps

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Mauricio Pazos wrote: > On Monday 01 November 2010 11:08:53 am lv wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am new in GIS and GeoTool. My question is about how to change the >> Geoserver's source code. I should send this email to Geoserver's mailing >> list but nobody can tell me how t

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

That is great news Roy. It is always nice when someone steps up and takes on an unsupported module. I believe the official maintainer of the module is Gabriel. So he may want to weigh in. But usually it goes that someone contributes a few patches to a module, and once they have the trust of the ex

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-trunk #3124

See -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and C

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3305) WFSClient throws "Element or attribute do not match QName production: QName::=(NCName':')?NCName." for some layers.

WFSClient throws "Element or attribute do not match QName production: QName::=(NCName':')?NCName." for some layers. --- Key: GEOT-3305 URL: http://jira

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 I have just started using the module in AtlasStlyer a week ago, and it can be used for some stuff. Still sometimes there are ugly bugs that i do not understand enought to fix alone. I would be in "the group". Steve Am 02.11.2010 10:43, schrieb F

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

1++ I'd like to get the module back to supported land too. But before we can start I'd like to have some information about: Should we start from scratch or just reactivate the module? Could somebody describe the design decisions and best practices to develop an ows client? Who would be act as a me

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to modify source code to offset maps

On Monday 01 November 2010 11:08:53 am lv wrote: > Hi, > > I am new in GIS and GeoTool. My question is about how to change the > Geoserver's source code. I should send this email to Geoserver's mailing > list but nobody can tell me how to modify Geoserver's source code at > Geoserver's mailing-list

[Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

List, the thread 'How to create BBOX Filter with FilterFactory2' triggered me. I want to get the WFS module back to supported and TRY to support WFS 1.1.0. But i don't know where to start What's the status now? What needs to be done? Is there already somebody working on it? Can we form up