Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal

2011-01-04 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Apologies for being behind on this proposal. I don't know if anything went > forward on this. I don't seen any commits that indicate so. Here is my > feedback. > * +1 on the idea as a whole of ditching geoapi > * +0 on a new opengis module

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal

2011-01-04 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Good thoughts, I second that. Cheers, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:31 -0700, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Apologies for being behind on this proposal. I don't know if anything > went forward on this. I don't seen any commits that indicate so. Here > is my feedback. > > > * +1 on the idea as a

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-util for org.opengis pending interaces

2011-01-04 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Not sure if this one moved at all but why not just use the existing api module? Or are the new geoapi interfaces considered too unstable? On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> -1 based on the chosen module name. > > > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal

2011-01-04 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Apologies for being behind on this proposal. I don't know if anything went forward on this. I don't seen any commits that indicate so. Here is my feedback. * +1 on the idea as a whole of ditching geoapi * +0 on a new opengis module. I personally would rather see them in the geotools api module in

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3369) Use PixelIsArea rather than PixelIsPoint convention in geotiff writer

2011-01-04 Thread Simone Giannecchini (JIRA)
Use PixelIsArea rather than PixelIsPoint convention in geotiff writer - Key: GEOT-3369 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3369 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Task