[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4021) Increase test coverage for SQL server store

2012-01-17 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Andrea Aime created GEOT-4021: - Summary: Increase test coverage for SQL server store Key: GEOT-4021 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4021 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement

[Geotools-devel] Adding one optional geometry metadata table to the Oracle data store

2012-01-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, following up the work about the startup/teardown sql startup scripts we noticed that there might be issues accessing the geometry metadata in said scenario. In particular, in that security setup some tables might not be accessible by the pool user at all, even if the database metadata about

Re: [Geotools-devel] Upgrading ImageIO-Ext on 2.7.x series

2012-01-17 Thread christian . mueller
Hi Daniele, I succeeded with a gdal installation on a power pc architecture and I see the additional gdal formats in the geoserver admin gui. I want to use gdal big geotiff format. In the WEB-INF/lib folder I find gt-geotiff-8-SNAPSHOT.jar imageio-ext-gdalgeotiff-1.1.2.jar

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding one optional geometry metadata table to the Oracle data store

2012-01-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I can see adding the table to databases that have no notion of a geometry metadata table but adding when one already exists seems like kind of a workaround for this specific problem. But I could be totally wrong and perhaps this is a common issue... would have to delegate to actual oracle users on

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding one optional geometry metadata table to the Oracle data store

2012-01-17 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: I can see adding the table to databases that have no notion of a geometry metadata table but adding when one already exists seems like kind of a workaround for this specific problem. But I could be totally wrong and

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding one optional geometry metadata table to the Oracle data store

2012-01-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hey Andrea, Thanks for the extended explanation. Makes sense. +1 on the approach, I think having the geometry_columns table for an override even when there is a geometry metadata table available makes sense. -Justin On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4022) gml:CompositeValueType in GMLSchema 3.1 has missing element

2012-01-17 Thread Rini Angreani (JIRA)
Rini Angreani created GEOT-4022: --- Summary: gml:CompositeValueType in GMLSchema 3.1 has missing element Key: GEOT-4022 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4022 Project: GeoTools Issue