That was my first reaction as well!
On 10/02/12 02:23, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> To be honest that class makes me understand the arguments people have about
> generics in java :)
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Martin Davis wrote:
> Andrea, I'm a bit late to the party on this one, but I came across this
> query while starting to come up to speed on the GT mailing list.
>
> In order to prevent data redundancy (with the inevitable risk of getting out
> of synch), would it be
Andrea, I'm a bit late to the party on this one, but I came across this
query while starting to come up to speed on the GT mailing list.
In order to prevent data redundancy (with the inevitable risk of getting
out of synch), would it be possible to implement the GEOMETRY_COLUMNS
table as a view b
Cool, thanks for the info guys. I did already commit the patch but i am
happy to roll it back and instead downgrade to 3.7.0. What do folks prefer?
To be honest that class makes me understand the arguments people have about
generics in java :)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wr
