TLDR:
I have found a regression: The constructor ReferencedEnvelope(
CoordinateReferenceSystem ) can now fail (previously it would always work).
This change is introducing issues in downstream software (such as
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5474).
Discussion:
Andrea has commented
I notice that the ReferencedEnvelope3D issue
(https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5148) is still marked as in progress.
Do you have anything to add to the discussion Niels? I do not want to step on
your toes, but I also need to sort out a fix promptly.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 28
Jody
Davide
Jody
+1 from me - I haven't had a chance to look at the latest pull requests but
the NeoJ stuff looked good to me
Ian
On 28 November 2012 13:20, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it wrote:
Hi,
Davide (cc'ed) has been making a number of pull requests lately
with good quality and tests
Yeah not very happy trying to pass the following test case - any suggestions?
public void testTransformToWGS84() throws Exception {
String wkt = GEOGCS[\GDA94\,
+ DATUM[\Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994\,
+ SPHEROID[\GRS 1980\, 6378137.0,
Okay sorted out my next approach (for when the dimensions do not match):
a) For ReferencedEnvelope3D - transform to DefaultGeographic.WGS84_3D and drop
down to WGS84 manually, and then transform to the target CRS
b) For ReferencedEnvelope - Transform to WGS84 and then and in NaN when
manually
Hi Jody,
That issue should have already been resolved ages ago, sorry about that.
Your solution sounds perfect.
Kind Regards
Niels Charlier
On 28/11/12 10:05, Jody Garnett wrote:
I notice that the ReferencedEnvelope3D issue
(https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5148) is still marked as in
+1. Welcome, Davide.
On 28/11/12 21:20, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
Davide (cc'ed) has been making a number of pull requests lately
with good quality and tests (contentFeatureCollection.isEmpty optimization,
dpi rescale visitors, wfs store, filter splitters bugs, referencing
build fix,
and he's
+1 from me, Andrea can you point Davide in the direction of the code
contribution agreement and so forth? We need an email from him, confirming he
has sent something in.
On a related note, I have a couple of outstanding emails going back and forth
with OSGeo trying to confirm they received
11 matches
Mail list logo
