[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master #4621

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Keep yourself connected to Go P

Re: [Geotools-devel] XSD bindings for OWS 2.0 and WCS 2.0

As a client we are subject to version negotiation, so same module is fine as we need access to all the implementations to have a conversation. -- Jody Garnett On Friday, 30 November 2012 at 7:23 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I would vote to throw them directly in the existing modules... i t

Re: [Geotools-devel] XSD bindings for OWS 2.0 and WCS 2.0

I would vote to throw them directly in the existing modules... i think putting them in a separate package sufficiently segregates from interfering But no strong preference. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > following up the OWS 2.0 and WCS 2.0 EMF models we are going

[Geotools-devel] improved kml parsing

Hi all, Recently myself and a colleague of mine (Rob Marianski) worked on some improved parsing for KML. Including support for parsing KML 2.2 along with some of its advanced "custom data" features, ie "SchemaData" and "ExtendedData". The work is mostly constrained to the kml bindings which afaik

[Geotools-devel] XSD bindings for OWS 2.0 and WCS 2.0

Hi, following up the OWS 2.0 and WCS 2.0 EMF models we are going to have the XSD bindings for the both of them (with some testing of course). Where do I land those? Directly in the existing xsd-ows/xsd-wcs modules? The alternative being rolling up a couple of new community modules Cheers Andrea

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master #4620

See Changes: [jdeolive] copying over feature user data on init [jdeolive] added a PullParser parser class based on java stream parsing interface [jdeolive] returning top of stack if called when documentHandler is null [jdeoli

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4330) Adding PullParser class

Justin De

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4329) parsing support for KML 2.2

Justin De

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing Davide Savazzi for commit rights

Nice. The one I am thinking of is in our developers guide. But yeah OSGeo uses ours as an example. It includes instructions on where to send it. When you have that in the mail drop us a note with your GitHub ID and we will add you to the project. And once again welcome. -- Jody Sent wi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing Davide Savazzi for commit rights

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > +1 from me, Andrea can you point Davide in the direction of the code > contribution agreement and so forth? We need an email from him, confirming > he has sent something in. Hi, thanks for the votes! Is this the agreement? http://download.os