Hey Andrea,
I took the liberty of updating the version numbers while setting up the
hudson jobs. Just going to run it through the build server now.
-Justin
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've just created the 9.x branch (so far I've forgotten to change the
> v
Hi all,
I've just created the 9.x branch (so far I've forgotten to change the
version numbers in
the pom's, going to do so tomorrow morning, but if you want to go ahead, be
my guest):
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/9.x
Now, theoretically the branch should have been done from the 9.0-bet
Ian Schne
Thanks Ben and Rini, I will go ahead and disable the test for now and
continue with my testing.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:41 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to dig the original issue for the test:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3493.
> The original behaviour was to swallow the exception
Hi,
I managed to dig the original issue for the test:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3493.
The original behaviour was to swallow the exception and quietly display an
empty result.
This is not an acceptable behaviour as it would be frustrating for the users to
find the configuration fault
