Simone Gi
My apologies for not making it again guys. I had full intentions of making
it today but embarrassingly slept through my alarm. Will try again in two
weeks.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> GeoServer/GeoTools meeting March 4th 2013
> --
Andrea,
the queried layer is an SQL view:
select uuid_area,
uuid_nocs, uuid_gaul,
da.ia_name,
ia_listname,
dn.at_iso3,
at_iso2,
at_admlevel,
'${resolver.getMeasureName(''' || uuid_area || ''')}' AS
measure_name,
'${resolver.getValue(''' || u
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, carlo cancellieri <
carlo.cancelli...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Recently I'm having some random resultset problems on postgis layers in
> geoserver 2.2.5 (geotools 8.7).
>
> May be related to this https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4204 ?
>
Seems unlikely... ar
On Friday, March 01, 2013 03:10:17 PM Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Ahhh, ok, I am sorry, i didn't understand that it was just CQL that you
> wanted to keep aligned with OGC. That works fine for me. For background the
> context i am using this is geoscript, in which a big part the api is based
> upon
GeoServer/GeoTools meeting March 4th 2013
--
Participants
-
Andrea Aime
Jukka Rahkkonen
Jody Garnett
Topics
--
1) Where is everybody? :-p
2) Release Train
3) NetCDF what is up?
4) The end of incubation
1)
Hi Björn
The module is part of geotools and used by geoserver. Since I do not want
to break existing behaviour I can imagine the following solution.
Adding a new xml configuration element which defaults to
false. If it is true, I can skip the code switching the x and y values.
In your concrete
Hello,
Is there any code snippet to render polygons as open lines?
Very much appreciate if someone can send me this.
Regards.
David
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Well, since we have only positive votes, I prepared the pull request:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/142
>
Given there was no negative feedback I've merged the patch right away, if
it
Well, since we have only positive votes, I prepared the pull request:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/142
Thanks.
Mauro Bartolomeoli
2013/3/1 Andrea Aime
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
> ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> The one question mark I have is
10 matches
Mail list logo