On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Mihail Ivanchev mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello GeoTools!
For my research work I am drawing aliased lines of thickness 1 with the
requirement that coincident line segments should be drawn using the same
set of pixels in the common region. Sadly, this is not
Hi,
I need to add a new functionality to the rendering engine that allows to
add spaces around the symbols in a graphic fill.
The need for spaces in graphic fill is easy to understand, it allows to
control the density of the fill.
However, in this case I also need to be able to control the
Rini
Hi,
I am looking into end-to-end support for circular arcs in GeoTools.
The requirement would be to take a circular arc from the data source (SQL
Server 2012 in this case,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff929141.aspx), and maintain the
data in its native form until it can be encoded in
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
So my feedback (from the meeting) was that I tend to focus not he Tasks
section (in order to determine what work is needed from the community to
make the proposal happen, and what time frame the work is happening in).
As said, the parsing and key name are already there, I would just like to use
them inside PolygonSymbolizer instead of being limited to TextSymbolizer like
today
Any concern?
Seems fine, challenging problem.
Joody
GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2013-05-27
===
Attending
-
Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira
Jukka Rahkonen
Agenda
--
* FOSS4G NA
* Passing thread locals in thread pools
* Arc support in GeoTools
* GeoTools change
Hi all,
I tried to fix some remaining issues with GEOT-4467, in particular the
File.deleteOnExit() usage.
You find the alternative solution here:
https://github.com/mbarto/geotools/commit/c1733941f9cfaf3642e7ce33cf8844b4ae21b104
It's based on synchronization in the topic moments of resolving
Justin
I'll do all of the heavy lifting. :]
Thanks for stepping up as the official mentor Andrea. I'll have Julian
touch base in the next few days when we get some initial tasks complete.
Landon
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at
Sounds like a good approach to me. So to clarify, are you planning on
taking the Circle/Arc code from the gml3 module and putting that in the api
module?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Hi,
I am looking into end-to-end support for circular arcs
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone had any objections to backporting this change.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/195
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4457
I ask because it adds a new interface, FeatureAttributeVisitor. However it
shouldn't have any backwards compatibility
Hello, Andrea.
Aliased rendering is not popular these days (everybody wants maps to be
pretty).
That said, I guess having a nicer alternative for those that do can always
come in handy.
It's indeed a nice alternative; I personally consider the default behaviour
flawed. I agree one doesn't
Thanks, Mauro. That looks great!
I had two small stylistic observations:
(1) I do not think you need your static synchObject; you could achieve
the same effect synchronising on the class object with
synchronized(SchemaClass.class).
(2) If you make any minor changes, please remove the trailing
+0.
Andrea, this is a thoroughly documented proposal. The level of detail
inspires confidence; only my lack of knowledge of coverages in GeoServer
limits my vote to +0.
On 08/05/13 23:34, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi all,
here is our overhauled proposal for multicoverage grid readers:
+0. (Same reason as before.) I do have a couple of questions:
My recollection is that the NetCDF CF (previously COARDS) Conventions
were limited to one-grid-per file. Are your multiple coverages all on
the same grid?
Do you support CF Conventions?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 09/05/13 00:00, Andrea
With the recent adoption of the new GeoTools contributor agreement, the
PMC considered the status of patches submitted by community members who
have not signed the agreement. For example, we sometimes receive patches
attached to Jira issues or emailed to the mailing lists. As mentioned in
17 matches
Mail list logo
