On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Ah, the final location is a bit of a mystery... this thing is not a plugin
> in the strict sense, there is no factory and no store, you are supposed to
> call TransformFactory.transform(source, targetName,
> listOfAttributeDefinitions) in orde
> All of the above is achieved by associating the new set of attributes each
> with a OGC Expression, like in the test cases, see the three methods setting
> up some transformations:
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/unsupported/transform/src/test/java/org/geotools/dat
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm writing you to start the process to graduate the gt-transform module
> to supported status.
>
> For those that don't know, the gt-transform module provides a way to
> create wrappers around SimpleFeatureSource/SimpleFeatureStore that
Hi,
I'm writing you to start the process to graduate the gt-transform module to
supported status.
For those that don't know, the gt-transform module provides a way to create
wrappers around SimpleFeatureSource/SimpleFeatureStore that do alter the
attributes exposed via:
* attribute selection
* att
Emailed.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 5:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
> mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au)> wrote:
> > Jody,
> >
> > here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> > policy, as discus
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> On 14/06/13 15:49, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
>> has headers in test classes, that I remember at least
>>
>
> Every one I wrote or cleane
On 14/06/13 15:53, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Nice. Should we ask them to cc the devel list when they send the
> contributor agreement?
> meh, as I write it I realize that would make their signature
> public, which is bad.
> The idea was to get immediate confirmation that the agreement was
> actuall
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
Nice. Should we ask them to cc the devel list when they send the
contributor agreement?
meh, as I write it I realize that would make
On 14/06/13 15:49, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
> has headers in test classes, that I remember at least
Every one I wrote or cleaned up has them. But headers are not required
to enforce copyright; without them, no rights are lost. I
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We are redistributing tests, just not to end users.
>
> In my view, tests are code too and need headers and copyright.
>
Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
has hea
On 14/06/13 15:45, Andrea Aime wrote:
> One more thing. You say new file, should we qualify new non testing file?
> If someone is adding a testing resource, or a new test class, stuff that
> does not get redistributed
> along with the binaries... should they sign anyways?
Yes. We are redistributin
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
One more thing. You say new file, should we qualify new non testing file?
If someone is adding a testing resource, or a new test class, s
Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
On 14/06/13 15:36, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Very quick recap, there is one thing I don't remember.
> The new contribution agreement can be faxed or e-mailed, right?
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Res
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Jody,
>
> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/212
Very quick recap, the
Thanks. Merged.
On 14/06/13 15:23, Jody wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>
>> Jody,
>>
>> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
>> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
>> https://gith
+1
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Jody,
>
> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/212
>
> - Patches that add n
16 matches
Mail list logo
