Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

It just passed on Boundless Jenkins (ares). Either a path-with-spaces issues of ogr installation issue. I can confirm that it failed locally as well. On 05/03/14 15:53, Jody Garnett wrote: > It built for me locally, but I assume it is avoiding running tests as I > do not have OGR installed. > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

I take that back, I have it installed on the command line, no way of knowing if it is picking that up and running tests. Jody Garnett On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > It built for me locally, but I assume it is avoiding running tests as I do > not have OGR installed. > > J

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

It built for me locally, but I assume it is avoiding running tests as I do not have OGR installed. Jody Garnett On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > Jody, > > I am seeing a bunch of unit test failures in gt-ogr-bridj: > https://cgsrv8.arrc.c

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

Jody, I am seeing a bunch of unit test failures in gt-ogr-bridj: https://cgsrv8.arrc.csiro.au/jenkins/view/geoserver-master/job/geotools-master/761/ Running a local test now to confirm. Kind regards, Ben. On 05/03/14 15:07, Jody Garnett wrote: > Moved the OGR module to plugins. > > See https://

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4719) Verify labelling preserves whitespace from Attribute Value

Title: Message Title Jody Garnett reopened an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

Jarred you also get a new geotools component in Jira: - https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT/component/16476 I have marked you as component lead (since Andrea already does so much!) Jody Garnett On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Moved the OGR module to plugins. > > See ht

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

Moved the OGR module to plugins. See https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4724 for details. I have applied the change to master and 11.x. Jody Garnett On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks Jared, they are now available on the website: > - http://docs.geotools.org/late

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4724) Promote OGR to supported status

Title: Message Title Jody Garnett created an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

Thanks Jared, they are now available on the website: - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/ogr.html I think we can set up a pull request to move OGR to plugins directory now. Jody Garnett On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:48 PM, jerickson wrote: > Hi all! > > I just sent a pull re

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

Hi all! I just sent a pull request to update the OGR docs. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/383 and https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4723 Thanks, Jared -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Pushing-ogr-to-supported-status-on-trunk-at-least-tp510

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4723) Improve OGR module documentation

Title: Message Title Jared Erickson created an issue

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4722) SelectionLab NPE

Title: Message Title Jody Garnett created an issue

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-master #181

See -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Fa

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #180

See -- [...truncated 2095 lines...] --- T E S T S --- Running org.geotools.referencing.crs.CRS

[Geotools-devel] PMC meeting minutes March 4th 2014

GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2014-03-04 === Attending - Ben Caradoc-Davies Jody Garnett Andrea Aime Agenda -- - ogr and geojson modules - RC2 - GeoServer 2.4.5 - h2 and postgis upgrade? - check outstanding pull requests - dimension default value

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #179

See Changes: [sgraca] [GEOT-4721] DataUtilities.createSubType does not preserve default geometry property -- [...truncated 31612 lines...] 126976/? 131072/? 135168/? 139264/? 143360/? 14745

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4721) DataUtilities.createSubType does not preserve default geometry property

Title: Message Title Sebastian Graca created an issue

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 11-RC2 released today

Please check out the new GeoTools release candidate, this is planned as the last release before the final release of 11.0 so this is your last chance to shake it down before production. See the blog post at http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/geotools-11-rc2-released.htmlfor more details. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

On 04/03/14 17:08, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au>> wrote: > "Currently have a very simple requirement for user documentation. > Please make something (anything!) available in GeoTools User Guide" > > http:/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing geojson to supported

On 04/03/14 17:04, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au>> wrote: > One question: is there any advantage for GeoServer to move to gt-geojson > for JSON WFS output format? (I think it currently uses > net.sf.json-lib

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > On 04/03/14 16:33, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett > > wrote: >> There is a placeholder page for the ogr module here: >> http://do

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

On 04/03/14 16:33, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > There is a placeholder page for the ogr module here: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/ogr.html > If we can steal a code example from te

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing geojson to supported

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > +1. GeometryJSONTest tells me it supports 3D. > > One question: is there any advantage for GeoServer to move to gt-geojson > for JSON WFS output format? (I think it currently uses > net.sf.json-lib:json-lib

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing geojson to supported

+1. GeometryJSONTest tells me it supports 3D. One question: is there any advantage for GeoServer to move to gt-geojson for JSON WFS output format? (I think it currently uses net.sf.json-lib:json-lib.) Kind regards, Ben. On 03/03/14 01:51, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Inspired by the ogr module p

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

I always ask for a code example at a minimum when a module goes to supported status. Jody Garnett On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> There is a placeholder page for the ogr module here: >> http://docs.geotools.org/latest

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > There is a placeholder page for the ogr module here: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/ogr.html > > If we can steal a code example from test cases it would be good, looking > to just get people started with something the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

There is a placeholder page for the ogr module here: http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/ogr.html If we can steal a code example from test cases it would be good, looking to just get people started with something they can cut and paste. Jody Garnett On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:2

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing geojson to supported

I checked the docs for GeoJSON - has some code examples I stole from test cases. http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/unsupported/geojson.html Jody Garnett On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Justin Deoliveira < > jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com>

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing ogr to supported status (on trunk at least)

All right, if there is no more discussion on the topic, I'll move the ogr mdoule set to supported land next weekend Cheers Andrea -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perfo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing geojson to supported

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Inspired by the ogr module push to supported on master how do people feel > about pushing the geojson module to supported as well? > > I believe it ticks all the boxes and really is just a formality at this > point. > +1 here Cheers And