Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-data events bug?

2014-05-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Your original bug report made sense, I was just going through the senario to use to test if fix works. Jody Garnett On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Niels Charlier wrote: > Jody, > > If the events need to be sent to the listeners of 'source', then there is > no need for a loop. While multiply

[Geotools-devel] build box java 7

2014-05-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Build box ares is now using Java 7 for master. -- Jody Garnett -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing s

[Geotools-devel] Revisiting the UniqueVisitor

2014-05-07 Thread César Martínez Izquierdo
Some weeks ago, I asked about the UniqueVisitor on the user mailing list (see [1]) for building queries similar to: SELECT DISTINCT(name) FROM osmadmlv2 ORDER BY name asc OFFSET 2 LIMIT 4 The conclusion is that UniqueVisitor can't currently produce this result. It was suggested that the optimize

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-data events bug?

2014-05-07 Thread Niels Charlier
Jody, If the events need to be sent to the listeners of 'source', then there is no need for a loop. While multiply the event sent to source by the amount of entries there are (apart from source itself)? If it does need to be sent to 'source', why the check if(entry==source){continue;// no no

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4790) UomRescaleStyleVisitor breaks ImageLab

2014-05-07 Thread Jody Garnett (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Jody Garnett created an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-data events bug?

2014-05-07 Thread Jody Garnett
I am not sure Niels, we do have some tricky logic around source vs entry, but I expect you are on to something. The test case to write (to confirm this) involves two transactions: a) One transaction issuing a bulk event, such as commit b) A second transaction, which should get this commit notifica

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

2014-05-07 Thread Niels Charlier
On 07/05/14 11:28, Andrea Aime wrote: > > I have a question, did you test the store interactively (e.g., from > udig/geoserver) against any WFS server, > if so, which ones? (as in type and version, don't need the caps urls) > So far I have only tested connecting to another geoserver. Kind Regard

[Geotools-devel] gt-data events bug?

2014-05-07 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Everyone, while working on wfs-ng, I think I found a bug in the events system in gt-data. This is my suggested change: https://github.com/NielsCharlier/geotools/commit/af9df3e282d0ad70fbf463fa5e2b36225a53116a In modules/library/data/src/main/java/org/geotools/data/store/ContentEntry.java

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

2014-05-07 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Niels Charlier wrote: > Hello, > > My task is to make wfs-ng a supported module; and also to enable > transactions on a wfs-ng datastore that uses wfs 1.0/1.1. > > (Almost) everything I did is in the following branch: > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit

[Geotools-devel] wfs-ng improvements

2014-05-07 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello, My task is to make wfs-ng a supported module; and also to enable transactions on a wfs-ng datastore that uses wfs 1.0/1.1. (Almost) everything I did is in the following branch: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commits/wfs-ng-improvements This consists of the following changes: 1.