On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Cool,
>
> I am also seriously considering adding getVersion() to our Info object. It
> has an obvious use for WFS, PostGIS and similar. I am not sure if shapefile
> has different specs or not?
>
There is only a single spec for shapefiles, peo
Cool,
I am also seriously considering adding getVersion() to our Info object. It
has an obvious use for WFS, PostGIS and similar. I am not sure if shapefile
has different specs or not?
Jody Garnett
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Jody,
>
> Yeah of course you're right
Jody,
Yeah of course you're right I was a bit confused. It is quite
straight-forward to solve.
Just need to overwrite getInfo in WFSContentFeatureSource, and need to
write some extra stuff in the strategy to take that info out of the
getcapabilities.
Will do.
Regards
Niels
On 30/05/14 13:57
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
>
> So is meta taking a list of strings, each string parsed as a key value
>>> pair? sounds okay.
>>>
>>
>> Right, it would be split at the first = and added into the metadata map
>>
>
> Sounds good, assume this more legible then just alternat
> So is meta taking a list of strings, each string parsed as a key value
>> pair? sounds okay.
>>
>
> Right, it would be split at the first = and added into the metadata map
>
Sounds good, assume this more legible then just alternating key, value
pairs:
meta = {"mimeTypes","application/json,tex
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrea Aime <
> andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
>> annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
> annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of extra
> metadata meant to be added in the Param metadata map.
>
Good idea, goal was to have t
Hi,
in this mail I'm proposing that we extend the parameter and result process
annotation with a meta key that would allow the specification of extra
metadata meant to be added in the Param metadata map.
The following example is geared towards specifying a mimeTypes
and a selection entries in the
