Hi all!
I was looking into Andrea's recent support for curved geometries and
discovered that the WKTReader2 can't parse the following WKT:
MULTIPOINT ((111 -47), (110 -46.5))
but it can parse
MULTIPOINT (111 -47, 110 46.5).
The JTS WKTReader can parse both. This means that WKTReader2 isn't a
On 15/07/14 20:18, Jerome Villeneuve Larouche wrote:
> I could simply package the binaries, but my goal is to create a package
> that could be available on the official repositories and for that the
> package needs to be built from source.
> Do you think this is the good approach? Do you guys think
Yep,
I would not mention the word "coverage-experiment" anymore! :)
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 11
Hi Jody,
2014-07-15 18:29 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett :
> I think that will be fine Nicola, and yes I note this is not new API, only
> the addition of 3 new formats.
>
> Usual guidelines apply: test coverage and documentation
>
> Let me check that out, documentation page for coverage experiment is sa
I think that will be fine Nicola, and yes I note this is not new API, only
the addition of 3 new formats.
Usual guidelines apply: test coverage and documentation
Let me check that out, documentation page for coverage experiment is sadly
empty:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/cov
Dear All,
I would bring your attention to the fact that we are not proposing a
new API but rather porting to supported status 3 new formats:
- GriB1
- GriB2
- NetCDF (loosely CF compliant)
There exists already a community module for them in GeoServer, hence
we wouldlike to start pushing this plug
Hi all,
I would ask to the list if it could be possible to move some sub-modules
inside the coverage-experiment directory from Unsupported to Plugin. The
modules are: gt-coverage-api, gt-netcdf and gt-grib. This is not an API
change proposal.
These modules focus their attention on accessing Multi
On 14-07-15 09:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jérôme,
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:03:28PM -0400, Jerome Villeneuve Larouche wrote:
>> My name is Jérôme and I'm currently working on a GSoC project to
>> package differents GIS Softwares and one of goals this summer is
>> working on packaging Jav
Hi,
I could simply package the binaries, but my goal is to create a package
that could be available on the official repositories and for that the
package needs to be built from source.
Do you think this is the good approach? Do you guys think
GeoServer/GeoTools need to be on the official repos
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> The presence of JAI is detected at runtime. It is not required to use
> GeoServer (but desirable for some mapping applications). If JAI is
> present in some repo and then installed into a JDK, it is a prop
Jérôme,
have you considered simply repackaging the existing GeoServer binaries?
In my view, this will save you a great deal of effort.
I recommend shipping the contents of the basic GeoServer war.zip as the
basic GeoServer. There is a great deal of hidden wisdom in the GeoServer
release module
Thanks, Andrea. This was a nice-to-have but it is indeed a bit
optimistic to expect 3D support. IIRC even SQL/MM defines arcs only in
2D. Ah, well, one day. :-)
On 11/07/14 19:04, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Ah, one thing for Ben, unfortunately the time is tyrant and I did not manage
> to add 3d suppo
Thanks, Rini, your advice was accurate: the broken override I removed
was masking the functionality in this method.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 15/07/14 14:11, Angreani, Rini (Mineral Resources, Kensington) wrote:
> It's also done in gml2/GMLEncodingUtils.GeometryPropertyType_getProperty.
--
Ben Car
Andrea,
here is a pull request for your feature branch:
https://github.com/aaime/geotools/pull/5
Full builds of this branch and GeoServer master both pass for me.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 15/07/14 14:19, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Thanks, Rini.
>
> I think I found the problem: there is an unwante
14 matches
Mail list logo
