Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Jody, it seems to me Justin also backported the CSS fixes: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commits/2.6.x So... we should be good to go release wise, unless I'm missing something Cheers Andrea On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Ian several fixes (to CSS Edit pag

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Ian Turton
Cool then I'll start the release train this afternoon, with luck I can get GeoTools done in time for Kevin to do a GCW release on it and do GeoServer tomorrow. Ian On 23 September 2014 13:48, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > it seems to me Justin also backported the CSS fixes: > > https://github

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-12.x #12

2014-09-23 Thread monitor
See -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready f

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Ian Turton
The GeoTools 12.0 release artefacts are available to test/build against on http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.0/ Everyone if you could kick them around a bit and make sure everything looks good I'd be grateful. Kevin if you could let me know when you've released GWC I'll kick off th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Jody Garnett
That is great - thanks Justin. It is still worth double checking master vs 2.6.x if we get a chance today. Jody Garnett On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > it seems to me Justin also backported the CSS fixes: > > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/commits/2.6.x

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Kevin Smith
Sorry, I'll try to fit it in, but my bandwidth for this is constrained at the moment. On 23 September 2014 08:17, Ian Turton wrote: > The GeoTools 12.0 release artefacts are available to test/build against on > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.0/ > > Everyone if you could kick th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release GeoTools 12.0 / GeoServer 2.6.0 plan

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ian Turton wrote: > The GeoTools 12.0 release artefacts are available to test/build against on > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.0/ > > Everyone if you could kick them around a bit and make sure everything > looks good I'd be grateful. > Tried a

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4903) Add new community module: SOLR data store

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Andrea Aime created an issue

[Geotools-devel] SOLR data store landed on trunk

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, the SOLR based store module just landed no trunk, in the unsupported area (the module already had a +1 from Justin some time ago on this list). The store is pretty simple, just give it a url to a SOLR server, and a field that will be used to discriminate to which "feature type" a certain docum

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #394

2014-09-23 Thread monitor
See Changes: [andrea.aime] [GEOT-4903] Add new community module: SOLR data store -- [...truncated 133723 lines...] [ERROR]

Re: [Geotools-devel] SOLR data store landed on trunk

2014-09-23 Thread Justin Deoliveira
This is awesome. Thanks Andrea. Out of curiosity have you don't much benchmarking yet? Last thing I read about the spatial stuff in SOLR was boasting some pretty fast times for spatial queries compared to postgis. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > the SOLR based store

Re: [Geotools-devel] SOLR data store landed on trunk

2014-09-23 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Justin Deoliveira < jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > This is awesome. Thanks Andrea. Out of curiosity have you don't much > benchmarking yet? Last thing I read about the spatial stuff in SOLR was > boasting some pretty fast times for spatial queries compared to