Thanks, Rob. Good to have you back!
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 19/03/15 10:18, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have been lurking watching Geoserver like a fond grandparent now for a
> long time, and now perhaps going to be in a position to use it in anger
> again, so started playing with the la
That is how I have worked with a few teams - including LocationTech.
When we migrated to maven 2 a webdav folder was the 'best' way to set up a
public maven repository. We could as OSGeo to stand up a Nexus repository
(which may better handle scalability issues).
One part missing in this discussi
Hey folks,
I have been lurking watching Geoserver like a fond grandparent now for a
long time, and now perhaps going to be in a position to use it in anger
again, so started playing with the latest release.
I just wanted to say how fabulous it is looking, (visually, technically and
support wise)
It is not really that important, the OGC intends for these schemas to be
distributed - it just there license is confusing and not clearly compatible
with open source (they ask for a different version number if you change it
or something sensible from a standards viewpoint).
OGC / Debian are workin
Managed to review, had a couple questions about ResourceInfo.getName() API.
I am on IRC if you want to quickly blast through this...
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 13:47, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Yeah definitely.
>
>
> On 18-03-15 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had a
Yeah definitely.
On 18-03-15 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had an action item to review the changes but
did not get to it.
I assume this change is of benefit to geoserver wfs cascade (and would
like to be included in the release?)
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 08:
Ciao Mauro,
a couple of things:
-1- I would advise talking to Daniele about the Dynamic ColorMaps
-2- It would be good if we could take coverage statistics into account
somehow in order to have styles that adapt to the coverage dynamic
itself.
Let me know your toughts about this.
Regards,
Simone
Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had an action item to review the changes but did not
get to it.
I assume this change is of benefit to geoserver wfs cascade (and would like
to be included in the release?)
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 08:18, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Hello Sampo,
>
> Thank you for
Thanks Travis,
We have a blocker on the geoserver side (and a few pull requests highlight
on tuesdays meeting to get in). I will ping geotools-devel with the
revision when we get one out of cite tests.
So stay tuned ...
--
Jody
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 09:45, Travis Brundage
wrote:
Hey all,
I should have sent this out last week, but it looks like we have hit our
GeoTools 13 release date. This will be the first stable release of GeoTools
13. Jody and I will be working together on getting this release out.
Cheers,
Travis
--
Travis Brundage
Software Engineer | Boundless
tbru
Hi Andrea,
> Oh, but I see what you mean, you want to keep it as a string, and if it's
> a string instead of a number,
> do CQL parsing of it inside SLDColorMapBuilder.
>
> Hum... well, it's similar to what we did for the dynamic symbolizers, as
> the sld syntax does not really
> allow for a full
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>>> Seems to be it's well aligned with other changes we made in the past
>> where OGC restrictions were lifted/relaxed to that
>> we could use expression instead of Literal or PropertyName.
Title: Message Title
Daniele Romagnoli created an issue
Hello Sampo,
Thank you for your review and your comments, I have responded to them.
I hope we can push this commit through asap.
Kind Regards
Niels
On 13-03-15 15:01, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about the radio silence. I've been working on an unrelated big
project and I haven't had a
Title: Message Title
Steve Ikeoka created an issue
Hi,
>
>> Seems to be it's well aligned with other changes we made in the past
> where OGC restrictions were lifted/relaxed to that
> we could use expression instead of Literal or PropertyName.
> I beleive this is going to break the raster symbolizer interfaces
> (backwards incompatible change), ca
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Mauro Bartolomeoli <
mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to introduce the possibility to use CQL expressions to
> specify the value of some attributes of ColorMapEntry SLD tags in raster
> symbolizers.
> My purpose is to be able to use
Title: Message Title
Mauro Bartolomeoli created an issue
Hi,
I would like to introduce the possibility to use CQL expressions to specify
the value of some attributes of ColorMapEntry SLD tags in raster
symbolizers.
My purpose is to be able to use values from WMS requests (specifically
variables in the ENV parameter) to dynamically specify those entries
a
Title: Message Title
Mauro Bartolomeoli created an issue
Here's the links: Apparently Jody started it with
http://www.how2map.com/2015/02/a-good-test-for-ogc-and-osgeo.html and then
discussion followed here
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/2015-February/000834.html
Ian
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:16 AM Ian Turton wrote:
> Seeing Ben's mention
Seeing Ben's mention of the OGC schemas reminded me of a similar discussion
on the osgeo-standards list where one of the linux distros (debian?) was
rejecting Tiny OWS because of the license on the OGC schemas. I'll see if I
can find the thread as it is probably relevant to this discussion too.
Ia
+1
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39
+1
Christian
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Ian Turton wrote:
> +1
>
> On 17:38, Tue, 17 Mar 2015 Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Jody Garnett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With CodeHaus being shut down I would like to formally move our wiki to
>>> github.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> C
24 matches
Mail list logo
