Dear All,
motivated by Andrea:
http://sourceforge.net/p/geoserver/mailman/message/34095134/
I adopted new projection, used often by Numerical Weather Prediction
community. Proposed name for this transformation is "General Oblique
Transform" or "Rotated Pole Coordinates Transform". The fi
Are you running with mvn or eclipse? I tested with mvn and it was correctly
tearing down the DB and connections.
Ian
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 2:59 am Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Ian,
>
> after PR 872 was merged I now get several failures.
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/872
>
> I am usin
Ian,
after PR 872 was merged I now get several failures.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/872
I am using postgres 9.4.
Failed tests:
PostgisTemporalFilterOnlineTest>OnlineTestCase.run:123->JDBCTemporalFilterOnlineTest.testEndedBy:162->JDBCTemporalFilterOnlineTest.assertDatesMatch:70->
Pull request is here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/873
--
Jody Garnett
On 10 June 2015 at 11:33, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> Quick follow up to the skype meeting; I would like to request a new
>> community module for a mongodb i
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Quick follow up to the skype meeting; I would like to request a new
> community module for a mongodb implementation based on ContentDataStore.
>
> Aside: the existing gt-mongodb implementation is based on
> AbstractDataStore and I would like
Quick follow up to the skype meeting; I would like to request a new
community module for a mongodb implementation based on ContentDataStore.
Aside: the existing gt-mongodb implementation is based on AbstractDataStore
and I would like to replace it.
It is my intention to collaborate with Stefano o
Hi Jody,
I'd say, since we never had a supported mongodb store, I'd go for replacing
it instead
of making a "ng" of something very few people used so far anyways (my 2
cents).
Our plan was actually to patch the existing one to make it a
contentdatastore based one
anyways.
Cheers
Andrea
On Wed, J
Sound great, I think we already have a few parameters we could mark as
deprecated.
--
Jody Garnett
On 10 June 2015 at 10:36, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah I would be fine with that; you can of course just add the entry to
>> the Param me
Clarification: Thanks for offering, but Tyler or myself will need to move
the code over (as boundless representatives we need to fix up the headers
and stuff)
Question: Did you have any feedback on if we should request to replace the
contents of gt-mongodb or create a gt-monodb-ng ?
(Your answer
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Yeah I would be fine with that; you can of course just add the entry to
> the Param metadata (it is an open ended data structure). We tend to only
> break out a method when several implementations need the same functionality.
>
>
Yeah, stora
Thanks Stefano:
We are aware of your timeframe and apologize for the delay on our end.
I am going to talk with Tyler first and then one or the other of us will
send a request for community module shortly.
I hope your contract could be used to review the codebase and improve the
test coverage. Bu
Sorry, there was a spelling error in my previous e-mail: I meant "we
(GeoSolutions) have been contRacted", not just "contacted" :-)
Da: "stefano.costa" stefano.co...@geo-solutions.it
A: "Geotools-Devel list" geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Data: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:50:48 +0200
Oggetto
Hello,
we (GeoSolutions) have been contacted by a customer who is having issues
with the community MongoDB plugin for geoserver to improve it in terms
of features, performance and alignment with the GeoTools latest changes.
I would be happy to become the module maintainer as well.
This morning I r
While trying to check if I've broken the build I found that the remaining
issue for the Oracle tests seems to be a permissions issue.
testTypeNames(org.geotools.data.oracle.OracleTypeNamesOnlineTest)
Time elapsed: 0.85 sec <<< ERROR!
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-01031: insufficient privi
I submitted a pull request (https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/871)
including a test. GeoTools and GeoServer build fine on my machine.
If calling the constructor is never the correct course of action, why is it not
deprecated (should I add it on the pull request)?
Regards,
Hendrik
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
