Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
A fixed date might imply that this was the last time the file changed. Could we write this to start with the file creation year but make it an open date range? (C) 2011-, Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) or (C) 2011-present, Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) as the en-dash (o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Torben Barsballe
Copyright header with file creation date sounds like a good idea, although a would assume we would still want aspects of option B here - specifically, if there is ever a copyright transfer event, all the headers would need updating. I assume we would do something similar to the following: /* (c) 2

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Justin Deoliveira
To be clear option C is not to drop the copyright header all together, just the date that lives in the header. I am for any option that doesn’t require us to continuously change the header for every commit. So I am +1 with a copyright header that contains the file creation date. On Thu, May 19, 2

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Putting those two tensions together can I recommend a compromise - > > "Copyright header using file creation date" > > This compromise provides copyright header and does not require ongoing > extra effort to maintain. > I'd second this one t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Jody Garnett
So yeah, the vote boils down to a tension between two things: - have a copy right header (A,B,D) or not (C) - we appear split on this issue based on where "C" appears in PSC ranking - require ongoing extra effort (A,B) or no effort (C,D) - this appears important based on this proposal itself, and w

Re: [Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5422) jndi fails with jTDS driver

2016-05-19 Thread Mark Prins
2016-05-19 14:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Prins : > I'm looking into solving this but would like to hear opinion; my initial > thought is to code a JDTSSQLServerJNDIDataStoreFactory + spi that > extends SQLServerJNDIDataStoreFactory and that > wraps JTDSSqlServerDataStoreFactory... any other opions? > > I'v

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

2016-05-19 Thread Justin Deoliveira
All the votes are in. Thanks everyone. If D is still on the table then it looks like it is the winner… but as previously discussed I am not sure how feasible that option is. Taking D out of the equation C (dropping the date from the copyright header all together) becomes the winner. So unless som

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5422) jndi fails with jTDS driver

2016-05-19 Thread Mark Prins (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Mark Prins created an

Re: [Geotools-devel] API changes compatibility reports

2016-05-19 Thread Ponomarenko Andrey
Hello, Yes, the tool checks daily for new GeoTools packages available in the https://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/ directory. Thank you. BTWThe report for the 15-RC1 version has been added today: http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/timeline/geotools/ 18.05.2016, 21:34, "Jody Garnett":