Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime [Administ
Thanks Andrea!
I’ll definitely update the proposal to make it clear that what is being
covered is just the “simple case”. Part of the rationale of the factory was
that we could eventually add new callback interfaces as needed, so there
should be some room to “grow” to account for this other stuff.
Hi Justin,
had a quick look, the proposal looks good to me.
>From an implementation point of view, what about joins, aggregate queries
being optimized out, and the like? (maybe also writing)
I believe you don't intend to cover them, I'd suggest to update the
proposal so that it makes it clear those
Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime [Administ
Hi folks,
I’ve incorporated Jody’s feedback and updated the proposal, and submitted a
pull request.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1474
I’ll let this one simmer for a day or so and if I don’t get any more
feedback I’ll call for the official vote.
Thanks!
-Justin
On Thu, Feb 9, 20
Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime [Administ
Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime [Administ
