I think porting over the old models would be great topic for a code sprint.
Especially since there will be a bit of stuff around the models (custom xml
bindings, request handling in geoserver, etc…) that also needs to change.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:12 AM Nuno Oliveira
wrote:
> Image-mosaic use
Image-mosaic uses JAXB for parsing indexer files (Indexer.xsd and
Indexer.java).
I add to generate the bindings for the Indexer and with JAXB it was dead
easy (a command line tool if my memory serves me well):
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1330/files#diff-21bc719f7346cc82417653798e
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Ian Turton wrote:
> Well today's experiments have shown that you can build a model with EMF -
> we just need to bump the EMF version we use from 1.6 to 1.12 which seems to
> keep every thing happy(ish).
>
+1 for upgrading (after a round of build tests maybe :-p)
Well today's experiments have shown that you can build a model with EMF -
we just need to bump the EMF version we use from 1.6 to 1.12 which seems to
keep every thing happy(ish). To be honest I'm still a little unsure of what
EMF is gaining me but I am making progress.
If we could get the funds fo
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> About the models that exist though… it would be a serious undertaking to
> port them to something else. Also keeping in mind that at the time they
> were built the only parser I could find that could actually handle some of
> the crazy OG
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> That said I agree with Andrea, given the chance to do this over again I
> would certainly push for not using EMF and the way those model generations
> work. I would say moving forward that definitely for newer models being
> added not to
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Who was it that once said something about complaining without offering up
> any alternative to make it better…?
>
I did... but I don't have anything to offer in this case, I never had an
occasion to delve much into options for that.
I di
Title: Message Title
Andrea Aime [Administ
Who was it that once said something about complaining without offering up
any alternative to make it better…?
That said I agree with Andrea, given the chance to do this over again I
would certainly push for not using EMF and the way those model generations
work. I would say moving forward that def
Hi Ian,
yep, it's a royal pain... the latest model I've generated, I've done the
EMF way, but it required
grabbing a Eclipse as old as the tutorial, then generating the object model
from the schema, and twaking
the interfaces and re-generating the EMF model iteratively until I got to a
satisfactory
Do we as a project have a view on how to generate bindings from an XML
schema?
The XML Faq (http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/xml/faq.html)
helpfully lists 7 different parsing approaches while the internals page (
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/xml/internal/index
11 matches
Mail list logo
