Re: [Geotools-devel] Draft "GeoTools 17.4 Released" blog post

Thanks, Jody. Kind regards, Ben. On 18/12/17 14:08, Jody Garnett wrote: Thanks Ben, that looks much better. I went over previous 17.x announcements looking for more "about geotools 17" items. Should be good to go :) -- Jody Garnett On 17 December 2017 at 14:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: Bl

Re: [Geotools-devel] Draft "GeoTools 17.4 Released" blog post

Thanks Ben, that looks much better. I went over previous 17.x announcements looking for more "about geotools 17" items. Should be good to go :) -- Jody Garnett On 17 December 2017 at 14:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Bloggers please review the draft "GeoTools 17.4 Released" blog post. > > I re

[Geotools-devel] Draft "GeoTools 17.4 Released" blog post

Bloggers please review the draft "GeoTools 17.4 Released" blog post. I reformatted the text copied from 17.3 because it had become a mix of different styles copied and pasted and edited over the years. Links were of different colour depending on their ancestry. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-D

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.4 artifacts available for testing

Building on macOS, java 1.8.0_102, just a command line maven build so no further insight into why it was slow. More interested if anyone else has seen this pause. -- Jody Garnett On 17 December 2017 at 13:57, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Thanks, Jody. > > The ArcGridVisualizationTest.testReadFil

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.4 artifacts available for testing

Thanks, Jody. The ArcGridVisualizationTest.testReadFileGZip pause is interesting. That naughty test uses File.toURI().toURL() not URLs.fileToUrl(File). I wonder if it produces a broken URL on your platform? Could a broken URL be misinterpreted as a remote resource or otherwise be unusually slo

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.4 artifacts available for testing

Thanks Ben: - bin - seems fine, everything accounted for, README has correct links etc... - doc - javadoc does not have any README, but otherwise seems fine. Since it is intended for primarily programatic use in an IDE I expect it is good as is. - project - building okay in 17 m

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.4 artifacts available for testing

Artifact sizes sane. No SNAPSHOT jars in bin. Correct version numbers in user and API docs. Full build with empty repo passes (with online tests against postgis for good measure). On 18/12/17 09:04, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/release/17.4/ -- Ben Caradoc-D

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.4 artifacts available for testing

https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/release/17.4/ -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engagin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Add extra vendor option (displacementMode) in SLD to control finer control text displacement when rendering labels

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Nikolaos Pringouris wrote: > My initial suggestion for this extra option stems from my personal > experience recenlty working in some cadastral applications. > I believe that's where the problem lies, your experience is too focused on a particular kind of map, a