Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

2019-10-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Andrea, I understand I am a bit late providing feedback. With respect to events, perhaps the interface stability aspect is addressed by the ability to add default methods. And I agree the pattern is: RenderListener listens for RenderEvents which may have a RenderEvent.Type (along with othe

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

2019-10-17 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 PM Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Indeed it is not, I was regretting already while typing. It's just that > I've seen that typo and FeatureCollection.accepts(visitor) instead of > "accept()" far too long and felt like squeezing it in. But you're totally > right. > Eh, fixin

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

2019-10-17 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:30 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > Can I ask you to fill in the tasks section, want to be sure we have a > clear picture of the work involved. > > You have events for the layer by layer notifications, and subsequent > labeling activities, is there any need to have events for t

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

2019-10-17 Thread Jody Garnett
> Totally get it, thanks. As a matter of fact, I've used multiple > StreamingRenderer's with a shared thread pool for a desktop JavaFX app with > great success. Yes, you gotta control how many of them run in parallel > nonetheless. One pain point is labeling though, it'd be awesome if multiple > re

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

2019-10-17 Thread Gabriel Roldan
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 05:16, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 PM Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> >>> Good point, they should be enclosed, meaning that the layer end needs to >>> be issued from the rendering thread. It can be done, matter of >>> implementation, something to be chec

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] GT/GWC/GS meeting minutes, October 15th 2019

2019-10-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Gaia3D has responded with $1000 (will wait for invoice before updating graphic). -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 01:14, Andrea Aime wrote: > Thanks Jody! > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:16 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> CITE tests updates >> >>> Home page updated to rep

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Trying to understand Java 11 failures

2019-10-17 Thread Torben Barsballe via GeoTools-Devel
I've swapped it back to the fleet for now. If we were to use the master node, I'd want to add a label to the java11 jobs so that they are the only ones which run on it (especially since other jobs may rely on resources not available on master). I could take a look at actually doing that sometime ne

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Trying to understand Java 11 failures

2019-10-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Torben, thanks for testing it out. As a curiosity, is the build back to use the fleet, or is it using the build server local hardware? At 50 minutes it's sure slow, but still beats a failing build. Cheers Andrea On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:06 PM Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@federal.planet.com>

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] GT/GWC/GS meeting minutes, October 15th 2019

2019-10-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Thanks Jody! Cheers Andrea On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:16 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > CITE tests updates > >> Home page updated to report GeoServer is implementing. Closing >> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7089 >> >> >> >>- >> >>Website text updated, graphic still needed :) >>