Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Ian Turton
No idea I'm afraid but it sounds like a grammar bug. Ian On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 14:08, Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi List, > Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an > extended version of CQL) supports a reduced grammar with respect

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

2019-11-05 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:26 AM Ian Turton wrote: > Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to > replace the mismash of xml technologies. > Hmm... a rewrite of XML techs with something would not be feasible if we had 10 times more funding I think. I think realisticall

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Daniele, I actually checked the CSW 2.0 spec and there is no trace of "eq" either... not sure where that came from honestly, but here at the sprint I see "eq" showing again in the JSON encoding of CQL so I'll ask what the deal is :-D Cheers Andrea On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:32 PM Daniele Romagn

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Ok, thanks! Regards, Daniele On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:10 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Daniele, > I believe "eq" is old, deprecated, thus it has been dropped > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:09 PM Daniele Romagnoli < > daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> Hi List, >> Sor

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Daniele, I believe "eq" is old, deprecated, thus it has been dropped Cheers Andrea On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:09 PM Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi List, > Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an > extended version of CQL) supports

[Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi List, Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an extended version of CQL) supports a reduced grammar with respect to CQL? For example, I see that CQL Grammar support '*eq*' | '*=*' | '*==*' as equality keywords https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/lib

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

2019-11-05 Thread Ian Turton
Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to replace the mismash of xml technologies. +1 Ian On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 21:49, Jody Garnett wrote: > It seems my email was taken as a motion, that is fine by me and I will add > my +1 > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Fri, 25 Oct