+0
I'd still voice my original objection, there should be a good way to deal
with bad apples when they show up,
e.g., people feeling entitled to free ad-hoc service, disparaging
contributors work, and the like.
Is there any guide on how to deal with these that would not also break the
covenant, e
+1 now as I don't recall having seen the original motion.
Ian
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 00:23, Jody Garnett wrote:
> This motion has been open for longer than the proposed waiting period, can
> I go ahead :)
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 12:37, fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it <
