Or, have a separate method, such as in java.util.Spliterator#estimateSize()
Thanks,
Emilio
On 9/2/20 3:44 PM, Emilio Lahr-Vivaz wrote:
In regards to returning -1, I believe the relevant count methods are
detailed below. It may make sense, if the API is changing anyway, to allow
for an 'exact'
In regards to returning -1, I believe the relevant count methods are
detailed below. It may make sense, if the API is changing anyway, to allow
for an 'exact' (or equivalent) parameter to force the count evaluation,
and remove the somewhat un-intuitive (to me at least) differentiation
between co
Hi all,
The JavaDoc on this method reminded me of one of the points I wanted to
suggest. If there are multiple methods for counting records, it may be
good to discuss the semantics. If I recall, some of the methods in
GeoTools have the idea that returning a -1 is suitable way to
communicate
Hi Jody,
I like this road, works fine for FeatureSource.
What about FeatureCollection though? It's already using "int size()", from
the interface:
/**
* Please note this operation may be expensive when working with remote content.
*
* @see java.util.Collection#size()
*/
int size();
Cheers
An
Here is another softer approach:
/**
* @return Returns the number of features in this collection, if this
collection contains more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements, returns
Integer.MAX_VALUE.
* @deprecated Please use count()
*/
public int getCount();
public long size();
This gives us a clear ap
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 14:44, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi, any other opinion on this?
>
> Personally I would not like breaking all existing store implementations
> and clients, for a "clean break" it seems quite bloody :-D
> But Jody suggests to go that way.
>
If we can manage to do it without an API
Andrea:
Thanks, I am aware (and watched that build go :D ). The checks I was
looking into were the packaging ones (links going to "stable", including
license files, etc...).
The jobs are all mostly happy, geotools-master-java11 is the only one that
is still failing.
I will be working on the blo
Hi, any other opinion on this?
Personally I would not like breaking all existing store implementations and
clients, for a "clean break" it seems quite bloody :-D
But Jody suggests to go that way.
Some tie breaker, or even multiple votes leading to another tie, would be
appreciated, ha!
Cheers
An
Hmm probably I have missed/overlooked these 2 functions when adding support
for ST_... functions in geotools 19.x.
In any case as you already mentioned the flag is direct available there so
you easily add support for the corresponding ST_ functions at that point.
Concerning Mysql v5.5 I think you
On 2020-09-01 19:24, Nikolaos Pringouris wrote:
Hi All,
A couple of years ago I worked on jdbc-mysql module and provided support
for the newly introduced ST_ functions in Mysql5.6 & Mysql 5.7. I think
these functions are also supported in Mysql8.0 with the same signature
so I do not think the
10 matches
Mail list logo
