Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

Thanks, I think you've nailed the main goal by the proposal. I did some change to the code example though. It would have been great to land this PR, and work with some of the bugs regarding HTTPClient. Regards, Roar Brænden > 4. jan. 2021 kl. 21:49 skrev Jody Garnett : > > I outlined the

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

I outlined the proposal here https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/HTTPClient-Factory I will ask for a review in tomorrow's meeting and trust we can get this done ahead of the next release. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Roar Brænden wrote: > Hi, > > I'm aware that you have

[Geotools-devel] remove validation extension

While reviewing Andrea's junit 3 --> 4 PR, I was once again struck by how stale the validation extension is, I believe it has been over ten years since this was used by geoserver or udig and can be considered for removal? -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Deve

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 17:30 UTC tomorrow

Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, January 5, at 17:30 UTC. You can join the meeting via Jitsi: https://meet.jit.si/GeoServerMeeti

Re: [Geotools-devel] Switching JUnit tests from v3 to v4... epic! (part 1)

Heh, So much for christmas holifdays with the family eh?... Great job! epic indeed. -M On 03-01-2021 09:56, Andrea Aime wrote: Hi, in the last few days I've been working on switching our large mass of JUnit 3 tests to JUnit 4. The original plan was simple: let IntelliJ do most of the job, w