Thanks Ian, yeah i removed the print on the awt rectangles that i get
from ( getGridGeometry().getGridRange2D().getBounds() ).
Also, that difference is visible in plannarImage.
I was wondering if that difference in data after serialization /
deserialization is "normal" and could affect the writing
and now without a zip file!
Ian
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 17:05, Ian Turton wrote:
> and here are my input png files (you'll need to add gt-image to read them)
>
> Ian
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 17:02, Ian Turton wrote:
>
>> It seems odd that you are dealing with java.awt.Rectangles - I'm not sure
It seems odd that you are dealing with java.awt.Rectangles - I'm not sure
where you are getting them from as there is no mention in the code. I
modified your code to this:
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
File input = new
File("/home/ian/code/geotools-cookbook/code/m
Hi,
I tried your suggestion to extend the old interfaces. Everything compiles and
seems to work fine, but GitHub Job Linux GitHub CI -> QA fails because of some
warnings for usage of deprecated classes. How can I avoid those warnings?
Here is one of the line it complines about:
public interface
Both X and Y are set to 0, in every GridCoverage2D deserialized.
I think that maybe some READ_GRIDCOVERAGE2D parameters are needed (?)
Original: java.awt.Rectangle[x=209,y=333,width=334,height=148]
After serialization / deserialization:
java.awt.Rectangle[x=0,y=0,width=334,height=148]
Serializatio
How different are we talking about here? You'll probably need to share some
code and example data to allow anyone to look into this.
Ian
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 11:58, Lorenzo Di Giacomo wrote:
> Hello, i'm try to serialize a GridCoverage2D using GeoTiffWriter
> writing in a ByteArrayOutputStrea
Hello, i'm try to serialize a GridCoverage2D using GeoTiffWriter
writing in a ByteArrayOutputStream and deserializing using
GeoTiffReader from the ByteArrayInputStream... The problem is that the
Bounds (Rectangle object) of the deserialized GridCoverage2D has
different X,Y then the original (the wi
Hi Jody,
if you don't mind, I'll remove the validation extension as part of the PMD
check fixes on the
test sources currently having like 120 failures in that module, it's a
good way to get rid of them :-D
Cheers
Andrea
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:38 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
> While reviewing A
+1
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +3
+1
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> +1 for removing it
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:38 PM Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> While reviewing Andrea's junit 3 --> 4 PR, I was once again struck by how
>> stale the validation extension is, I believe it h
10 matches
Mail list logo
