Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing commit rights for Marco Volpini in GeoTools

+1 Cheers, Torben On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:55 AM Nuno Oliveira < nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Dear all, > Marco has a steady history of GeoTools [1] contributions, he has always > shown respect for our development guidelines and the review process. > > He also acts as a mainta

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 16:30 UTC tomorrow

Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, September 14, at 16:30 UTC. You can join the meeting via Jitsi: https://meet.jit.si/GeoServerM

Re: [Geotools-devel] 26-RC artifacts ready for testing

I created a draft blog post which is ready for review: To aid in this the release notes and a query GeoTools RC / Release unique fixes (ie not backported a

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Rendering pre process Mark Factories extension point proposal

Good point about extending factor ( I just assumed because of the name). I expect FactoryListPredicate, however we can leave the idea for a future release if other factories desire the same level of flexibility. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 07:18, Fernando Mino < fernando.m...@geosolut

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Rendering pre process Mark Factories extension point proposal

Hi Jody, thanks for your review. The problem on making the filter class more generic is MarkFactory interface does not extend Factory or any other interface, so I need to make MarFactory as type hierarchy root definition. Also I tried to move the class to gt-metadata but since MarkFactory is a gt-

Re: [Geotools-devel] 26-RC artifacts ready for testing

Ahhh no... I have more technical dept than I thought I had... I stand corrected. In tha case my PR does not make much sense anymore Thanks Andrea On 13-09-2021 15:04, Andrea Aime wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:43 PM Mark Prins > wrote: After upgrading one of o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing commit rights for Marco Volpini in GeoTools

+1 Marco (and thanks for all your work) On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:55 AM Nuno Oliveira < nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Dear all, > Marco has a steady history of GeoTools [1] contributions, he has always > shown respect for our development guidelines and the review process. > > He a

Re: [Geotools-devel] stop just stop main vs Main vs 26.x

Thanks for checking Mark, it is also likely my bad (since I noticed the issue). Jody On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:21 AM Mark Prins wrote: > might have been my-bad, though I'm not aware of any mishaps and don't > have any forks or local branches that have this. I had a windows machine > on loan for

Re: [Geotools-devel] 26-RC artifacts ready for testing

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:43 PM Mark Prins wrote: > After upgrading one of our projects I noticed that > org.geotools.data.ows.HTTPClient could no longer be found; it seems to > have moved to org.geotools.http.HTTPClient as part of GEOT-6755. > Same thing for org.geotools.data.ows.SimpleHttpClien

Re: [Geotools-devel] stop just stop main vs Main vs 26.x

might have been my-bad, though I'm not aware of any mishaps and don't have any forks or local branches that have this. I had a windows machine on loan for a couple of days that may have caused this... It ("duplicate_main") does not seem to have any commits that the main branch has, so I think

Re: [Geotools-devel] 26-RC artifacts ready for testing

So it seems that the Jira ticket ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6755) wasn't marked as resolved/done when https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3256 was merged for 26 I've started https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3639 but won't have any thime to work on that this week

Re: [Geotools-devel] 26-RC artifacts ready for testing

After upgrading one of our projects I noticed that org.geotools.data.ows.HTTPClient could no longer be found; it seems to have moved to org.geotools.http.HTTPClient as part of GEOT-6755. Same thing for org.geotools.data.ows.SimpleHttpClient which was moved to org.geotools.http.SimpleHttpClient So

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing commit rights for Marco Volpini in GeoTools

+1 Cheers Andrea On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:55 AM Nuno Oliveira < nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Dear all, > Marco has a steady history of GeoTools [1] contributions, he has always > shown respect for our development guidelines and the review process. > > He also acts as a maintai

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing commit rights for Marco Volpini in GeoTools

+1 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy President GeoSolutions USA phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +3

[Geotools-devel] Proposing commit rights for Marco Volpini in GeoTools

Dear all, Marco has a steady history of GeoTools [1] contributions, he has always shown respect for our development guidelines and the review process. He also acts as a maintainer, with Fernando and myself, for App-Schema and MongoDB extensions, contributing with several fixes. What do you think?