First up thank you for the work, I spotted a couple documentation examples
that needed to change headers, but Ian merged before my review was done.

I recently looked at the geopackage module which also has a concept of
tiles sets and projections (and defines some data structure along these
lines). While the geopackage data structure is public it is not widely
used; so if their is an opportunity to combine forces it would be good.

GeoServer for the most part borrows data structure for grid sets from
geowebcache; making for some duplication.

Jody

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:25 AM Roar Brænden <roar.brenden...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For the last year I've been working with the gt-wmts module. I've tried to
> clarify the responsibilties between WebMapTileServer and WMTSTileService.
> The first one building on OGC web service modules, and gimmick the WMTS
> standard. While the other one WMTSTileServer representing a single WMST
> matrix set, and using the functionality of gt-tile-client.
>
> Now I've written the documentation for my work. Which is in this PR
> <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3750>.
>
>
> While working with that documentation I discovered that we still have some
> problems with WMTS and projections. There were some work lately to handle
> that, but it seems to have missed some particularities. I would like to
> investigate that, but I do also have another PR
> <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3722> I would see in the code
> base before diving into my investigations.
>
> Could anyone be so kind to have a look at my work?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roar Brænden
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
-- 
--
Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to