Re: [Geotools-devel] (no subject)

Thank you for your advice. I will choose to use the way you recommended Best wishes! Tiandy Ian Turton 于2023年5月22日 周一下午11:48写道： > As Mark suggested please try to use `gt-geojson-core` as we are trying to > deprecate the `gt-geojson` module which relies on an older and unsupported > dependen

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 18:30 CET / 9:30 PST tomorrow

Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, May 23, at 18:30 CET. Cheers, Torben

Re: [Geotools-devel] (no subject)

As Mark suggested please try to use `gt-geojson-core` as we are trying to deprecate the `gt-geojson` module which relies on an older and unsupported dependency. Ian On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 16:22, pengfei tian wrote: > Hi, > I found GeoJSONUtil.parse(featureCollectionHandler, > featureCollect

Re: [Geotools-devel] (no subject)

You are free to try and propose a pull request. Alternatively you could look into the geojson-core module and https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/48547967e75f2ef841751c3950b01e88cd5683e7/modules/unsupported/geojson-core/src/main/java/org/geotools/data/geojson/GeoJSONReader.java#L300 Op ma 22

[Geotools-devel] (no subject)

Hi, I found GeoJSONUtil.parse(featureCollectionHandler, featureCollectionJson,false) cant return FeatureCollection, so I think FeatureCollectionHandler should extends DelegatingHandler GeoJSONUtil: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/main/modules/unsupported/geojson/src/main/java/org/ge

[Geotools-devel] Java 11 features, one we still haven't used in code: var

Hi all, while usage of Java 11 specific API has started to trickle into the codebase already, for example, usage of List.of to build immutable lists. However, there is a language feature that I still haven't seen usage of, so far: "var", aka local variable type inference. A good article about is

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 29.1 release artefacts available for testing

On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 10:15, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Ian, > some time go a "build with empty repo" was added to the geotools-release > job, so if that is green, we're good on that aspect. > > I've just made a clean build anyway. > By the way, I was checking if we need a GWC 1.23.1, but it seem

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 29.1 release artefacts available for testing

Hi Ian, some time go a "build with empty repo" was added to the geotools-release job, so if that is green, we're good on that aspect. By the way, I was checking if we need a GWC 1.23.1, but it seems no commit has happened since 1.23.0, so I guess it's going to be a pass, and GeoServer can be relea