, could it be
considered for inclusion in the 15.1 release?
Thanks in advance,
Jim
On 08/01/2016 01:31 PM, Andrew Hulbert (JIRA) wrote:
Message Title
Andrew Hulbert
<https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=ahulbert>
*created* an issue
GeoTools <http
Title: Message Title
Andrew Hulbert
e (x = 1) OR
(x=2) OR (x=3)
This work is available on a single commit:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit/649853a304a4779ed86121151193ea0fe049f367
Comment on April 30th: "Resolved on master, will back port to stable
if it lasts the month"
--
Jody
Jody Garnett
On Wed,
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Andrew Hulbert <mailto:ahulb...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Jody,
Finally getting back around to this...
Just wondering if its possible to get a backport of
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/431 to the 11.x branch?
I
Jody,
Finally getting back around to this...
Just wondering if its possible to get a backport of
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/431 to the 11.x branch?
I might be have time in a few weeks to reformat it and test it against
11.x but figured I'd ask first!
Thanks,
Andrew
--
Forgot to ask...since you mentioned it...is there anything that you
thought should be a candidate for replacing the feature type representation?
On 04/29/2014 03:20 PM, Andrew Hulbert wrote:
I like the WKT name...I do remember now seeing that in your tutorial
(thanks for those by the way
I like the WKT name...I do remember now seeing that in your tutorial
(thanks for those by the way).
By feature type representation do you mean the
"name1:Integer,name2:Float" syntax? One thing that we run into with some
of the cloud toolkits is that they don't allow spaces or dashes for
field
een avro, text, and other formats of
interest (e.g. json) so that we can share the AvroSimpleFeature with
others and register serializers via SPI similar to DataSources.
On another note, what is the standard pipe-delimited format known as?
Pipe Delimited Text?
If anyone has any ideas/comments/inter
x27;t)? It seems that if the user wanted that they could use
the validating option (though its nice to do a conversion for them).
Though I'd like to not do conversions, I wanted to check to see if there
was that expectation or convention.
Thanks,
Andr
Hi,
I think I might have found a Class Cast bug where a StringBuilder is
expected but in certain cases a String is returned...It appears that
in org.geotools.filter.text.ecql.ECQL this method:
public static String toCQL( Filter filter ){
FilterToECQL toCQL = new FilterToECQL();
blic utility method making it easier to call and use the visitor object.
>
> I think we actually wrapped up all the utility methods into the CQL and
> ECQL classes to make this stuff easier to use.
>
> Jody
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:57 PM, A
Hi,
I think I might have found a Class Cast bug where a StringBuilder is
expected but in certain cases a String is returned...It appears that in
org.geotools.filter.text.ecql.ECQL this method:
public static String toCQL( Filter filter ){
FilterToECQL toCQL = new FilterToECQL();
12 matches
Mail list logo
