Re: [Geotools-devel] How to use a variation of BufferedCoordinateOperationFactory implementation?

I think I know the answer. Just extend BufferedCoordinateOperationFactory and do something like this at the starts of the whole system: CoordinateOperationFactory myFactory = new MyCoordinateOperationFactory(); Hints.putSystemDefault(Hints.COORDINATE_OPERATION_FACTORY, myFactory

[Geotools-devel] How to use a variation of BufferedCoordinateOperationFactory implementation?

very usefull. Thanks, -Felipe Felipe castro | Schneider Electric | Cloud Services | Software Engineer Tel: +1 952 882 4340 Email: felipe.cas...@dtn.com<mailto:felipe.cas...@dtn.com> | Site: www.schneider-electric.com<http://www.schneider-electric.com/> - 11400 Rupp Drive, Minn

Re: [Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

So here is what I have found so far. To correct for the hundreds of thousands of TheadLocal entries I just needed to do CRS. cleanupThreadLocals() at the end each request to my service. The case of the eternal instances of ObliqueStereographic and ObliqueOrthographic is because the pool of CRSP

Re: [Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

build a new CRS before each map. Is this something I am not supposed to do or should do via a different method? Thanks for the help, -Felipe -Original Message- From: Felipe Castro [mailto:felipe.cas...@dtn.com] Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 10:17 AM To: geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

Hi Andrea, thanks for posting ideas. How should I post my comments? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Memory-leak-when-using-StreamingRenderer-with-variations-in-WKT-based-CRS-s-tp5282556p5282573.html Sent from the geotools-devel mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: [Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

This is part of a memory map after rendering ~24K Orthographic and Stereographic projections: -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Memory-leak-when-using-StreamingRenderer-with-variations-in-WKT-based-CRS-s-tp5282556p5282566.html Sent from the geotools-devel ma

Re: [Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

Another thing I noticed is a comment in BufferedCoordinateOperationFactory: The pool of cached transformations. This map can not be static, because the values may be different for the same ({@code sourceCRS}, {@code targetCRS}) pair dependending of hint values like {@link Hints#LENIENT

[Geotools-devel] Memory leak when using StreamingRenderer with variations in WKT based CRS's

I would like some opinions about this. I am running a multi-threaded process to render thousands of maps using the Stereographic projection. Basically, I do the following for each new map: - Take a WKT definition for an Stereographic projection. - Modify latitude_of_origin and central_meridian.