[Geotools-devel] Github Workflow integration.yml throwing error

2023-10-07 Thread Joseph Miller
Not sure who is maintaining the GeoTools Github Workflow scripts, but heads up that the integration.yml is causing an issue at the following line: run: mvn -B -Dorg.slf4j.simpleLogger.log.org.apache.maven.cli.transfer.Slf4jMavenTransferListener=warn clean install -T2 -Dall --file pom.xml -DskipTest

[Geotools-devel] Jira ticket assignment permissions

2022-07-22 Thread Joseph Miller
As discussed with Jody, I would like to be added as a user who can assign himself tickets in Jira in order to avoif duplicate work conflicts. Thanks, Joe Miller @turingtestfail ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://

Re: [Geotools-devel] Test failures in ImageMosaic/PostGIS online tests

2022-03-21 Thread Joseph Miller
I saw that recently as well and did a very preliminary investigation that pointed to a dependency on a S3 hosted Landsat file that is no longer present. Joe On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Ian Turton wrote: > I'm seeing the following failures on both GitHub and locally: > https://github.com/geo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

2021-03-10 Thread Joseph Miller
I think ExcessiveMethodLength is an important check for the readability and maintainability for code. Is the opposite check also available? Something that would flag too much abstraction and/or too much inheritance or too many interfaces, leading to confusing, unreadable empty methods and classes

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-6652 GeoJSON beyond WGS 84

2020-12-18 Thread Joseph Miller
Is anyone working on this issue?: (Extending GeoJson projection support beyond WGS84) https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6652 Thanks, Joe Miller ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/l

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-6680 gridcoverage coordinates reversed

2020-11-22 Thread Joseph Miller
I'd like to take a stab at this issue unless anyone else is working on it: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6680 GEOT-6680 Use GridCoverageFactory to generate new gridcoverage (Transform TIFF format ,with tfw and prj files, to GeoTIFF format), the coordinates are reversed at some angl

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-11-04 Thread Joseph Miller
something I should submit as a PR to GeoServer? Is there an active GeoServer Developers mailing list? I only found the users list. Thanks, Joe Miller On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 5:16 PM Joseph Miller wrote: > Gotcha, my mistake. I just pushed an update that removes the wrapper and > just us

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-10-25 Thread Joseph Miller
Gotcha, my mistake. I just pushed an update that removes the wrapper and just uses JTS, as requested. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3190 Thanks, Joseph Miller On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 1:46 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Joseph, > I see the change in dependency in the pom, and b

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-10-25 Thread Joseph Miller
Andrea, As requested see the PR at https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3190 Thanks, Joseph Miller On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 4:46 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Joseph, > I'm working in the un-checked branch and just merged master into it, which > brought the cql-json module. >

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-6721 Cylindrical Equal Area

2020-10-20 Thread Joseph Miller
times Eric follows up with a PR of his own, I've cc'ed him on this >> mail to make >> sure you're not both working on it. >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:17 PM Joseph Miller >> wrote: >> >>> If no on

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-6721 Cylindrical Equal Area

2020-10-19 Thread Joseph Miller
If no one else is taking a look, I'd like to tackly GEOT-6721, an issue with the Cylindrical Equal Area Transform object. https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/GEOT/issues/GEOT-6721 Thanks, Joe Miller ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list G

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-10-16 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
e.html > > > I think we still need one even for unsupported modules > > Ian > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 16:24, Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel < > geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> As discussed in this email chain and in the GitHub PR comments sect

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-10-16 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
lt;https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/supported.html>. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 08:12, Joseph Miller wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback. I made most of the changes suggested. Since >> this is an unsupported module is there a s

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-09-29 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
ack provided. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 12:49, Joseph Miller wrote: > >> I have created an unsupported module for basic conversion of CQL-JSON >> into GeoTools Filters as discussed and am looking for feedback/guidance. >> The PR for the modul

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-09-24 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
ment > the variant of your liking (or even both). > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:47 AM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Gabe did the initial work if I remember, but that was a long while ago, >> please feel free to dive in! >> -- &g

[Geotools-devel] OGC Common Query Language 3

2020-08-29 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
I am interested in contributing some hours on keeping GeoTools' CQL to Filter capabilities up to speed on what is going on with the OGC Common Query Language 3.0 spec, particularly the CQL JSON stuff ( https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-features/tree/master/extensions/cql ) Is there currently

[Geotools-devel] Pull Request Submitted for GEOT-6386

2020-08-08 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
Heads up that I submitted a small Pull Request for GEOT-6386: CRS parse from WKT can ignore PROJCS Parameter EXTENSION https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3115 Thanks, Joe Miller ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-6386 Polyconic Spherical Case

2020-07-27 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
vis one has >>> several sub-checks) >>> and monitor failures, with particular attention to the automatic QA >>> checks >>> <https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/conventions/code/qa.html>. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Andrea >>>

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-6386 Polyconic Spherical Case

2020-07-27 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
working, and it would be welcomed. >>>> More often than not, we just port over the equivalent code from PROJ... >>>> probably this class: >>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/blob/master/src/projections/poly.cpp >>>> >>>> When you'll ope

Re: [Geotools-devel] GEOT-6386 Polyconic Spherical Case

2020-07-23 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
ols/geotools/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md > Try to check as many boxes as possible before asking for review, thanks! > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 8:29 PM Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel < > geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> I

[Geotools-devel] GEOT-6386 Polyconic Spherical Case

2020-07-20 Thread Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel
I am interested in developing a patch to address GEOT-6386, the Polyconic Spherical Case ( https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/projects/GEOT/issues/GEOT-6386) but wanted to make sure that nobody is currently working on it or that it hasn't been rejected for reasons that I am not seeing at first glance.