Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

+1 On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using > mostly GeoTools code, > GeoServer is providing mostly "glue" but the heavy lifting is done via the > GeoTools libraries > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTool release job improvement

Nice, thx Alessandro! On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:09 PM Torben Barsballe via GeoTools-Devel < geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Thanks! That is quite helpful. Please also update the docs > > accordingly. > > Cheers, >

Re: [Geotools-devel] About backporting GEOT-6330

+1, I will add the label back-porting tags :) On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:55 PM Ian Turton wrote: > +1 for me > > Ian > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 14:32, fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it < > fernando.m...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> >> Hi community, >> >> I think it would be nice to have [GEOT-6330

Re: [Geotools-devel] Residual split packages

Hi Andrea, please see my answers bellow: On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 2:35 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > after bringing the builds green I've looked at the jars to see if there > still are split packages. > Had to fix a couple of issues regarding SPI being declared in jars that > did not have the cla

Re: [Geotools-devel] repackaging the geotools library updates and PMC feedback needed

Please see my answers bellow: On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:26 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Sent a proposal out with the high level plan for this week - it has not > been approved: > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Restructure-GeoTools-into-Jigsaw-modules > Andrea had a question to see if we c

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing Nuno Deoliveira and Torben Barballe for PMC

:) On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:08 PM Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Thanks for updating everything Nuno, you beat me to it :-) > > Cheers, > > Torben > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:58 AM Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> Roger, with this we have all +1 and the motion is passed. >>