[Geotools-devel] Working with 16-bit sample models in geotools?

2016-05-20 Thread Rich Fecher
I had tracked an issue with GeoWave's implementation of AbstractGridFormat in which it seems the AbstractGridCoverage2DReader was storing and retrieving source images that had a single 16-bit band from landsat8 (so the data type for this sample model is unsigned short). The GridCoverage2D tiles th

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] osgeo maven repo

2015-03-20 Thread Rich Fecher
I don't think I was very clear. The javax.media:jai_core pom.xml with the same version geotools uses has been on maven central with the download URL as maven central had suggested. So geotools developers have been able to resolve it because of the OSGeo repository all along. So to explicitly ans

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] osgeo maven repo

2015-03-17 Thread Rich Fecher
; OSGeo repository. Like does the pom.xml with download instructions *have* > to stop searching at that point? > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 17 March 2015 at 13:40, Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Rich Fecher wrote: >> >>> I agre

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] osgeo maven repo

2015-03-17 Thread Rich Fecher
t; >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Rich Fecher wrote: >> >>> Re: GeoTools on Maven Central - I just added a "Research" heading with >>> updated proposal documentation as promised. >>> >>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] osgeo maven repo

2015-03-17 Thread Rich Fecher
ch >> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Jody Garnett >> wrote: >> >>> Makes sense, part of the library getting more popular. The Rich Fecher >>> possibly had some budget to put towards this (hence the proposal >>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTO

Re: [Geotools-devel] Deprecating ViewType, ViewsManager, (GridCoverage views native/packed/photographic/geophysic entities)

2015-03-10 Thread Rich Fecher
For GeoWave we were interested in leveraging JAI-ext's NoData support for statistics operations, so I did an initial cut at some of the legwork in geotools integration, specifically related to integrating into geotools' grid coverage operations (part of #2 in Nicola's list). Here's a snapshot of t

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] osgeo maven repo

2015-03-06 Thread Rich Fecher
FOSS4G NA next week is a great opportunity to discuss the next steps. I'll work on the proposal and send out something when I have it updated. Rich On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Makes sense, part of the library getting more popular. The Rich Fecher > possib

Re: [Geotools-devel] distributed rendering

2015-02-22 Thread Rich Fecher
And if the processes (WPS) could implement some form of serialization and some form of reduce, perhaps a distributable function could be decoupled from a distributable data source, which I think could really benefit the API. Again, thats just my perspective, but I wouldn't mind helping out if

Re: [Geotools-devel] Blocker for publishing to maven central

2015-02-17 Thread Rich Fecher
read the >> download instructions and deploy into your local repository. This is how >> all the javax dependencies were originally handled. They even have a maven >> FAQ entry on how to handle these kind of things. >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:53 AM Rich Fecher wrote: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Blocker for publishing to maven central

2015-02-17 Thread Rich Fecher
s already been done for us. > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM Rich Fecher wrote: > >> It appears we have a blocker on publishing geotools to maven central. >> The jars for JAI have been taken off of maven central. All of the poms are >> there, which gave me false hope when I

[Geotools-devel] Blocker for publishing to maven central

2015-02-17 Thread Rich Fecher
It appears we have a blocker on publishing geotools to maven central. The jars for JAI have been taken off of maven central. All of the poms are there, which gave me false hope when I was visually triaging any issues in the geotools dependency tree. There's a ticket against maven central strange

Re: [Geotools-devel] distributed rendering

2015-02-16 Thread Rich Fecher
Wow, a lot of great activity on this thread over the weekend. On my end, a family issue came up so I'm playing catch up now - first I'll try to give a little background and then try to start from the top and work down... As far as background, one thought here that's a bit bigger picture than my s

Re: [Geotools-devel] ecore version?

2015-02-13 Thread Rich Fecher
I would prefer to go forward if we have an option. Our use of EMF is not > very heavy (focus on fast access to generated EObjects, rather than the > slower java beans). No need to worry about events etc... > -- > Jody > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 13 February 2015 at 12:49,

[Geotools-devel] ecore version?

2015-02-13 Thread Rich Fecher
The maven dependency for ecore is not on maven central which is brought in through gt-xsd. But there are many other similar versions on maven central. The version hosted on osgeo is org.eclipse.emf:ecore:2.6.1 and it seems the closest version on maven central is org.eclipse.emf:org.eclipse.emf.ec

Re: [Geotools-devel] Replacing Vecmath

2015-02-13 Thread Rich Fecher
For GeoWave we are interested in moving dependencies to maven central and I was trying to track down various dependencies that are not on maven central. Vecmath 1.3.1 is available but not vecmath 1.3.2. If we are talking about replacing vecmath it would be very nice to choose a library that is on

[Geotools-devel] jai-ext BOF?

2015-02-12 Thread Rich Fecher
At FOSS4G NA would it make sense to have a jai-ext BOF to discuss how to further that effort towards integration with geotools? I think its a fairly common wish to get the no data handling that this project offers and just having an ongoing supported project to move beyond what jai currently offer

Re: [Geotools-devel] GridCoverage Resampler Issue

2015-02-10 Thread Rich Fecher
-EXT we introduced the concept of NoData, > which will be used by the Mosaic operation instead of the old > threshold value. > > Regards, > Nicola Lagomarsini. > > 2015-02-03 22:22 GMT+01:00 Rich Fecher : > >> We've been using the geotools' resample operation to

Re: [Geotools-devel] distributed rendering

2015-02-10 Thread Rich Fecher
Yeah, so on the GeoWave project we started out with a simple sub-sampling approach that used a render transform to pass the pixel dimensions of the map request to our data store so that we could skip within our tablet servers at the equivalent of a pixel resolution on our space filling curve. This

[Geotools-devel] GridCoverage Resampler Issue

2015-02-03 Thread Rich Fecher
We've been using the geotools' resample operation to generally resize rasters and have run into an issue. We have multiple bands with the double data type and in the situation where the transform resolves to an identity transform the resulting mosaic operation ends up masking some values. The Res

Re: [Geotools-devel] coverage operations wrapping jai-ext?

2014-08-28 Thread Rich Fecher
, should I hold off on any pull requests until an official 1.0 release of jai-ext or will a milestone release be sufficient? Any guidance is appreciated, Rich On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Rich Fecher wrote: > That's great, it sounds this is somewhere on the road map. > > I'

Re: [Geotools-devel] coverage operations wrapping jai-ext?

2014-08-22 Thread Rich Fecher
olutions S.A.S. > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > -

[Geotools-devel] coverage operations wrapping jai-ext?

2014-08-20 Thread Rich Fecher
I am currently working on extending https://github.com/ngageoint/geowave to support GridCoverage (as a new geotools grid format) and was wondering if any thought has been given to provide GeoTools coverage operations for https://github.com/geosolutions-it/jai-ext/ and if it were a worthwhile contri