Re: [Geotools-devel] [Fwd: [udig-devel] udigLite: An OSGi-friendly subset]

2009-03-20 Thread cholmes
When we switched to spring at the core we considered going with OSGi at the time. See http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+2.0+Technology (not quite the right name, as we still haven't gone to 2.0, I think we did the change for 1.5 maybe?) It's been great to start to see OSGi integ

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit rights

2009-03-20 Thread cholmes
Awesome. It would be really cool to add support for GeoWebCache, to use it as a datastore. And indeed for general WMS-C,WMTS, TMS, etc. Then GeoServer could backend on to an existing cache. Simone, after that step is done what more is there to make it so we can fully return WMS from that

Re: [Geotools-devel] Ease of Use vs Reality tradeoffs and the direction of FeatureCollection

2007-01-02 Thread cholmes
>> I would like to see this as a single discrete object: with the list I >> made above (FeatureType, Features, Summary) boiled down to a single >> class. > > Hum, FeatureType does not seem to be boiled down effectively, the > FeatureType of a FeatureCollection simply does not make sense to me? > I